非类型模板函数指针指向const成员函数 [英] Non-type template function pointer to const member function

查看:164
本文介绍了非类型模板函数指针指向const成员函数的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

我在写一个委托类,但它不能接受const成员函数。
这是一个测试用例:

I'm writing a delegate class but it fails to take const member functions. Here is a test case :

class foo
{
    public:
   void MemberFunction()
   {
         printf("non const member function\n");
   }

   void ConstMemberFunction() const
   {
           printf("const member function\n");
   }
};

template <class C, void (C::*Function)()>
void Call(C* instance)
{
       (instance->*Function)();
}

int main (int argc, char** argv)
{
       foo bar;
       Call<foo,&foo::MemberFunction>(&bar);
       Call<foo,&foo::ConstMemberFunction>(&bar);
}

现在编译器(visual studio 2010)给我一个错误, const成员函数到一个非const函数:

Now the compiler (visual studio 2010) gives me an error he cannot convert the const member function to a non-const function :

2>..\src\main.cpp(54): error C2440: 'specialization' : cannot convert from 'void (__cdecl foo::* )(void) const' to 'void (__cdecl foo::* const )(void)'
2>          Types pointed to are unrelated; conversion requires reinterpret_cast, C-style cast or function-style cast
2>..\src\main.cpp(54): error C2973: 'Call' : invalid template argument 'void (__cdecl foo::* )(void) const'
2>          ..\src\main.cpp(37) : see declaration of 'Call'

ok ,通过添加以下内容简单修复(I though:P):

ok, easy fix (I though :P ) by adding this :

template <class C, void (C::*Function)() const>
void Call(C* instance)
{
    (instance->*Function)();
}

但现在编译器完全混淆了。它看起来像他现在试图使用const函数为非成员函数和非const函数的const成员函数。

but now the compiler is completly confused (and me with it). it looks like he now tries to use the const function for the non-const member function and the non-const function for the const member function.

2>..\src\main.cpp(53): error C2440: 'specialization' : cannot convert from 'void (__cdecl foo::* )(void)' to 'void (__cdecl foo::* const )(void) const'
2>          Types pointed to are unrelated; conversion requires reinterpret_cast, C-style cast or function-style cast
2>..\src\main.cpp(53): error C2973: 'Call' : invalid template argument 'void (__cdecl foo::* )(void)'
2>          ..\src\main.cpp(43) : see declaration of 'Call'
2>..\src\main.cpp(53): error C2668: 'Call' : ambiguous call to overloaded function
2>          ..\src\main.cpp(43): could be 'void Call<foo,void foo::MemberFunction(void)>(C *)'
2>          with
2>          [
2>              C=foo
2>          ]
2>          ..\src\main.cpp(37): or       'void Call<foo,void foo::MemberFunction(void)>(C *)'
2>          with
2>          [
2>              C=foo
2>          ]
2>          while trying to match the argument list '(foo *)'
2>..\src\main.cpp(54): error C2440: 'specialization' : cannot convert from 'void (__cdecl foo::* )(void) const' to 'void (__cdecl foo::* const )(void)'
2>          Types pointed to are unrelated; conversion requires reinterpret_cast, C-style cast or function-style cast
2>..\src\main.cpp(54): error C2973: 'Call' : invalid template argument 'void (__cdecl foo::* )(void) const'
2>          ..\src\main.cpp(37) : see declaration of 'Call'
2>..\src\main.cpp(54): error C2668: 'Call' : ambiguous call to overloaded function
2>          ..\src\main.cpp(43): could be 'void Call<foo,void foo::ConstMemberFunction(void) const>(C *)'
2>          with
2>          [
2>              C=foo
2>          ]
2>          ..\src\main.cpp(37): or       'void Call<foo,void foo::ConstMemberFunction(void) const>(C *)'
2>          with
2>          [
2>              C=foo
2>          ]
2>          while trying to match the argument list '(foo *)'

如果我重命名第二个Call函数(与const),它一切正常,但我宁愿使用一个函数。

If I would rename the second Call function (with the const), it all works fine but I would rather use one function.

所以,任何人都可以指出我做错了,让这项工作吗?

So, can anybody point me towards what I'm doing wrong and how I can make this work ?

Thx!

推荐答案

通过从模板类型签名中删除函数指针,而不是依赖于重载来解决这个问题:

I think you might be able to address this by removing the function pointer from the template type signature and instead relying on overloading:

template <class C>
    void Call(C* ptr, void (C::*function)()) {
    (ptr->*function)();
}
template <class C>
    void Call(C* ptr, void (C::*function)() const) {
    (ptr->*function)();
}

现在使用正常的函数重载来选择应该调用两个函数。 const 成员函数指针将调用第二个版本,而非 const 函数将调用第一个版本。这也意味着您不需要明确地向模板函数提供任何类型信息;编译器可以在两个上下文中推导出 C

This now uses normal function overloading to select which of the two functions should be called. const member function pointers will call down to the second version, while non-const functions will call up to the first version. This also means that you don't need to explicitly provide any type information to the template function; the compiler can deduce C in both contexts.

让我知道如果(1)

希望这有助于!

这篇关于非类型模板函数指针指向const成员函数的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆