使可变函数具有任意数量的void函子 [英] Make variadic function which takes arbitary number of void functors

查看:97
本文介绍了使可变函数具有任意数量的void函子的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

我的动机上一个问题:使变量函数接受任意函数并返回输入函数的每个返回值的元组



现在,我想创建一个类执行可能返回void的每个函数对象。据我所知,我可以做一些像

  class A 
{
public:
template< class Func>
void operator()(Func func)
{
func();
}

template< class First,class ... Funcs>
void operator()(第一个,Funcs ... funcs)
{
first();
operator()(funcs ...);
}
};

此代码执行作业。
然而,我想必须有更聪明的方式像 Nawaz mfontanini



我试过以下模拟他们的代码。

  A 
{
public:
template< class ... Func>
void operator()(Func func ...)
{
func()...;
}
};

但是,gcc 4.7.2不能编译。

解决方案

您可以这样做:

  template< class ... Func> 
void operator()(Func ... func)//修正这里的语法
{
sink((func(),0)...)
}

其中 sink 定义为:

 模板< typename ... T& void sink(T ...){} 

sink 是吃表达式(func(),0)的值,它只是 0 不管 func()返回什么。即使 func()返回类型是 void ,它也会工作。





请注意,在上面的演示中,前两个函数返回值,但第三个返回 void p>

如果你想从左到右调用函数,可以使用list-initialization语法:

  int sink [] {func(),0)...} 

但它不必要地创建了一个变量。所以我将 sink 定义为struct:

  struct sink 
{
template< typename ... T>
sink(T ...){} //模板化构造函数!
};

您可以这样做:

  sink {(func(),0)...} //现在注意花括号! 

更新的演示:





希望有帮助。


motivated by my previous question : Make variadic function which takes arbitary functors and returns a tuple of each return value of input functors

Now, I want to make a class which just execute each function object which may return void. To the best of my knowledge, I can make something like,

class A
{
public:
    template <class Func>
    void operator()(Func func)
    {
        func();
    }

    template <class First, class... Funcs>
    void operator()(First first, Funcs... funcs)
    {
        first();
        operator()(funcs...);
    }
};

This code does the job. However, I guess there must be much more clever way like the codes by Nawaz and mfontanini in the above link.

I tried below imitating their code.

class A
{
public:
    template <class... Func>
    void operator()(Func func...)
    {
        func()...;
    }
};

However, gcc 4.7.2 doesn't compile. Am I missing here?

解决方案

You can do this:

template <class... Func>
void operator()(Func ... func) //corrected the syntax here
{
    sink( (func(),0)... );
}

where sink is defined as:

template<typename ...T> void sink(T...) {}

The purpose of sink is to eat the value of the expression (func(),0) which is just 0 irrespective of what func() returns. It will work even if func() return type is void.

Notice the in the demo above first two functions return something but the third one returns void.

If you want the functions to be called from left-to-right, then you can use list-initialization syntax:

 int sink[]{func(),0)... };

But it unnecessarily creates a variable. So I would define sink as struct:

struct sink
{
     template<typename ...T> 
     sink(T...) {}  //templated constructor!
};

With this you can do this:

sink { (func(),0)... }; //note the curly-braces now!

Updated demo:

Hope that helps.

这篇关于使可变函数具有任意数量的void函子的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆