允许派生类上的流操作符 [英] Allow stream operator on derived classes
问题描述
我有一个接口,可以归结为
I have an interface that boils down to
class interface
{
protected:
virtual void write(std::string const &) = 0;
};
以及派生类
class derived : public interface
{
protected:
void write(std::string const & buf)
{
std::cout << buf << std::endl;
}
};
在我的应用程序中,这些对象作为智能指针传递,即 std :: shared_ptr< derived>
。我希望我可以重载<<
运算符,但只有我的界面的派生的智能指针。我试过这个:
In my application, these objects are passed around as smart pointers, i.e. std::shared_ptr<derived>
. I hoped I could overload the <<
operator, but only for smart pointer of derivatives of my interface. I tried this:
class interface
{
/* ... */
private:
template <typename Derived> friend typename std::enable_if<
std::is_base_of<interface, Derived>::value,
std::shared_ptr<Derived>
>::type & operator<<(std::shared_ptr<Derived> & lhs,
std::string const & rhs)
{
lhs->write(rhs);
return lhs;
}
};
但是当我尝试 std :: shared_ptr& sp; sp < test;
,编译器指出 virtual void derived :: write(const string&)在此上下文中被保护
(这个上下文
是我的朋友函数)。
But when I try std::shared_ptr<derived> sp; sp << "test";
, the compiler complains that virtual void derived::write(const string&) is protected within this context
(this context
is my friend function).
有没有办法实现这个没有冗余地为每个派生类写一个流运算符?
Is there a way to achieve this without redundantly writing a stream operator for every derived class?
推荐答案
为什么不简单地将您的运算符定义为:
Why not simply define your operator as:
friend std::shared_ptr<interface> &operator<<(std::shared_ptr<interface> & lhs, std::string const & rhs);
并传递 std :: shared_ptr< interface>
?
这篇关于允许派生类上的流操作符的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!