CComPtr的向量是否仍然需要CAdapt？ [英] Do vectors of CComPtr still need CAdapt?

问题描述

STL具有 std :: addressof ，即使它重载运算符& 。在 std :: vectors中存储 CComPtrs 时需要使用 ATL :: CAdapt 。

STL has std::addressof which gets the true address of an object even if it overloads operator &. ATL::CAdapt was required to workaround this problem when storing CComPtrs in std::vectors.

无论如何，我想知道，使用C ++ 11，应该 std :: vector 包含 CComPtr ，而不需要 CAdapt ？

Anyway, I'm wondering, with C++11, should std::vector be able to cope with containing CComPtr's directly without CAdapt being necessary?

更具体地说，我使用的是VS 2013.是否支持向量没有 CAdapt ？

More specifically, I'm using VS 2013. Would that support vector without CAdapt?

推荐答案

引自 MSDN ：

这是C ++标准库容器
在支持C ++ 11标准之前最常用的，但是C ++ 11标准库
容器自动使用重载了
运算符&（）的类型。

This was most commonly necessary for C++ Standard Library containers prior to support for the C++11 Standard, but C++11 Standard Library containers automatically work with types that have overloaded operator&().

这看起来像你不需要 CAdapt ，因为Visual Studio 2013带有C ++ 11 STL。

This reads like you don't need CAdapt anymore because Visual Studio 2013 comes with a C++11 STL.

这篇关于CComPtr的向量是否仍然需要CAdapt？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！