现有标准样式和编码标准文档 [英] Existing Standard Style and Coding standard documents

查看:102
本文介绍了现有标准样式和编码标准文档的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

以下是针对即将推出的C ++项目的建议。

The following have been proposed for an upcoming C++ project.


  • Sutter和Alexandrescu的C ++编码标准

  • JSF Air Vehicle C ++编码标准

  • C ++风格的元素

  • 有效的C ++第3版,Scott Meyers

  • C++ Coding Standards, by Sutter and Alexandrescu
  • JSF Air Vehicle C++ coding standards
  • The Elements of C++ Style
  • Effective C++ 3rd Edition, by Scott Meyers

还有其他选择吗?

一些相关的链接

  • Do you think a software company should impose developers a coding-style?
  • http://stackoverflow.com/questions/66268/what-is-the-best-cc-coding-style-closed

推荐答案

我真的认为,无论你采用哪一个,只要每个人都遵守。有时,这可能很难,因为似乎一些风格不同意人们的习惯。也就是说它是下来争论是否用 m _ 将所有成员变量前缀为漂亮

I really think it does not matter which one you adopt, as long as everyone goes along with it. Sometimes that can be hard as it seems that some styles don't agree with peoples tases. I.e. it comes down to arguing about whether prefixing all member variable with m_ is pretty or not.

我一直在使用和修改 Geosoft 标准一段时间,这些都是针对C ++ 。 What-is-your-favorite-coding- guidelines-checklist thread

I have been using and modifying the Geosoft standards for a while, these are for C++. There are some other at the what-is-your-favorite-coding-guidelines-checklist thread

这篇关于现有标准样式和编码标准文档的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆