为什么要使用类方法构造函数与alloc / init？ [英] Why would you use a class method constructor versus alloc/init?

问题描述

Objective C / Cocoa中的构造函数有两种选择：

1。类构造函数

  Product * product = [Product productWithIdentifier：@Chocolate]; 
 //使用产品
  

2。 Alloc / init构造函数

  Product * product = [[Product alloc] initWithIdentifier：@Chocolate 
 //使用产品
 [产品版本]; 
  

我所做的

$ b b

• 我倾向于使用类方法，因为它看起来更干净，你不需要发布。


• 我看到很多alloc / init - 这样做有什么好处？

我的问题 b

• 最好是哪一个？
  
  
  
  
  
  
  

  对于上下文，Product类将具有以下内容：

    +（Product *）productWithIdentifier：（NSString * ）identifier_ {
   return [[[[self class] alloc] initWithIdentifier：identifier] autorelease]; 
  } 
   
    - （Product *）initWithIndentifier：（NSString *）identifier_ {
   self = [super init] 
   if（self）{
   identifier = identifier_; 
  } 
   return self; 
  } 
    

  
  

  解决方案

  ，两者之间没有太大的区别。

  
  
  

  alloc / init 组合给你一个拥有参考。这意味着你必须发布以后。变量 classnameWithFoo 返回非所有的引用。您不能发布。

  
  
  

  这遵循通常的Cocoa命名约定。除了以 alloc ， copy ，<$开头的方法之外，所有方法都返回非拥有（自动释放） c $ c> mutableCopy 和 new 。这些返回拥有引用，你必须发布。

  
  
  

  使用哪一个主要是品味的问题。但是，如果你需要临时对象，你可以快速处置 alloc 变量导致稍少的方法调用（ autorelease ），并且在一个循环中，它也减少了最大内存占用。然而，在大多数情况下，这种降低的成本是可以忽略的。

  
  

  There are two choices for constructors in Objective C/Cocoa:

  1. Class Constructor

  Product *product = [Product productWithIdentifier:@"Chocolate"];
  // Use product
  

  2. Alloc/init Constructor

  Product *product = [[Product alloc] initWithIdentifier:@"Chocolate"];
  // Use product
  [product release];
  

  What I do

  • I tend to use the class method just because it looks cleaner and you don't need a release.
  • I see a lot of alloc/init - what's the advantage to doing it this way?

  My Question

  • Which one is preferable? Or is it just a matter of taste?

  Code

  For context, the class Product would have the following:

  +(Product *)productWithIdentifier:(NSString *)identifier_ {
     return [[[[self class] alloc] initWithIdentifier:identifier] autorelease];
  }
  
  -(Product *)initWithIndentifier:(NSString *)identifier_ {
     self = [super init]
     if (self) {
         identifier = identifier_;
     }
     return self;
  }
  

  解决方案

  If you're using ARC, there's not that much of a difference between the two. If you're not using ARC, the difference is extremely important.

  The alloc/init combination gives you an owning reference. That means you must release it later on. The classnameWithFoo variant returns a non-owning reference. You may not release it.

  This follows the usual Cocoa naming conventions. All methods return non-owning (autoreleased) instances, except for the methods that start with alloc, copy, mutableCopy and new. These return owning references that you must release.

  Which one to use is mostly a matter of taste. However, if you need temporary objects that you can dispose quickly the alloc variant results in slightly fewer method calls (the autorelease) and in a loop, it also reduces the maximum memory footprint. However, in most cases this reduced cost is neglectable.

  这篇关于为什么要使用类方法构造函数与alloc / init？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！