有意调试而不使用调试器？ [英] Purposefully debugging without using a debugger?

问题描述

在第5章中编程实践 Brian Kernighan 和 Rob 派克写道：

作为个人选择，我们倾向于不要使用调试器来获取堆栈跟踪或一两个变量的值。

As a personal choice, we tend not to use debuggers beyond getting a stack trace or the value of a variable or two.

Although I have no empirical data on the topic, I suspect that it's likely that many programmers "live" in a debugger when they have one available in their environment. But I also suspect that there are many highly productive programmers who, like Kernighan and Pike, avoid debuggers as a first-line-of-defense and rely on other techniques.

所以，我想问stackoverflow社区：

So, I'd like to ask the stackoverflow community:

如果你是一种程序员，看到被称为调试器的工具是最后一个

一（1）为了更容易的投票，每个答案的原因！

One (1) reason per answer for easier voting please!

我也建议这个规则来回答：我不知道如何使用调试器是不是有效的答案。这只是无知。你应该在选择之前了解你的选择！

I'll also suggest this rule for answering: "I don't know how to use the debugger" is not a valid answer. That's just ignorance. You should understand your alternatives before making a choice!

推荐答案

通过你的代码不使用调试器F10 / F11可以让你更好的开发人员。

Not using the debugger to F10/F11 through your code can make you a better developer.

在我的第一份工作中，我在Linux中完成了大量的编程，Visual Studio调试器不可用。
由于调试困难，我已经学会了如何分析我的代码，并真正了解它的工作原理。而且，由于这个原因，我成了一个更好的开发人员。

During my 1st job I had done a lot of programming in Linux where Visual Studio debugger was not available. Because debugging was hard I've learnt how to analyse my code and really understand how it works. And I became a better developer because of that.

现在我只有在通过代码搜索通常的嫌疑人之后才使用调试器，如果我不明白我的代码如何工作，没有调试，然后我重构它。

Nowadays I do use the debugger only after I've gone over the code and searched for the "usual suspects" and if I do not understand how my code works without debugging it then I refactor it.

这篇关于有意调试而不使用调试器？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！