为什么TBitBtn包含的字形如此丑陋和过时？ [英] Why are the glyphs included with TBitBtn so ugly and outdated?

问题描述

即使是Delphi 2010，与TBitBtn相关联的字形也是波澜不惊和丑陋的。是否存在向后兼容的原因？ Embarcadero是否包含我可以使用的更新的png替换，而不是这些正常的字形？

也许只是我，但我很想看到Embarcadero征求（或雇用）图形设计师改善这些图标。

解决方案

哦，我希望控件会死： - / ...它是在Delphi 1中引入的，目标是16位Windows 3.x.那时候，按钮上的小字形非常小巧，装扮了UI。 （记住BWCC？）我认为UI标准要低得多，因为每次看到这些字形的应用程序时，我都很沮丧...它们主要包括用于向后兼容的目的。

只需坚持一个常规的TButton，这是一个本机的Windows控件，现在本机支持更多的风格，甚至比TBitBtn（我们也是元音挑战在那些日子）。如果你只需要在按钮上加上一个字形，Delphi / RAD Studio XE就可以从GlyFX（http://www.glyfx.com/）下载大量免费，更现代的字型。

The glyphs associated with TBitBtn for even Delphi 2010 are choppy and "ugly". Is there a backwards-compatibility reason that they remain? Does Embarcadero include updated png replacements that I could use instead of these normal glyphs?

Maybe it's just me, but I'd love to see Embarcadero solicit (or hire) graphic designers to improve these icons.

解决方案

Oh how I wish that control would just die :-/... It was introduced in Delphi 1, which targeted 16bit Windows 3.x. At that time little glyphs on buttons were very novel and "dressed up" the UI. (Remember BWCC?) I suppose the UI standards were much lower then, because I cringe every time I see an application with those glyphs... They are mainly included for backward compatibility purposes.

Just stick with a regular TButton, which is a native Windows control and now natively supports more styles than even the TBitBtn (we were vowel challenged in those days, too). If you simply must include a glyph on the button Delphi/RAD Studio XE includes a whole host of free, more modern, glyphs from GlyFX (http://www.glyfx.com/).

这篇关于为什么TBitBtn包含的字形如此丑陋和过时？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！