调用map :: count用空的weak_ptr作为参数安全吗? [英] Is calling map::count with an empty weak_ptr as argument safe?
问题描述
可以安全地 map :: count
在未初始化的空值 weak_ptr
安全?
我仍然没有经验的c ++,没有技巧来确定这个。 p>
在我的应用程序中,一个 weak_ptr
正被保留在地图中的关键字
并且必须首先被值找到。如果找不到,未初始化的 weak_ptr
是 return
ed,并在 map ::计数
。
代码
设置
map< my_ptr,connection_data,owner_less< my_ptr>> m_connections;
typedef map< my_ptr,connection_data,owner_less< my_ptr>> :: iterator it;
按资料查找
my_ptr get_my_ptr_from_data(string data){
my_ptr my_ptr_to_send;
for(it iterator = my_ptrs.begin(); iterator!= my_ptrs.end(); iterator ++){
if(iterator-> second.data == data){
my_ptr_to_send = iterator-> first;
break;
}
}
return my_ptr_to_send;
}
查找
my_ptr found_ptr = get_my_ptr_from_data(data);
if(my_ptrs.count(found_ptr)){
可以安全地调用 find
(和 count
),只要你定义的任何订单都不会t依赖指针是非空的。 找到
(和 count
)的唯一的事情是使用参数作为比较器的参数。
但是,使用 weak_ptr
作为关联容器中的键是不安全的。如果它过期,那么容器的顺序是破碎的,以后尝试使用容器会给出不明确的行为。
Is it safe to call map::count
on an uninitialized thus empty weak_ptr
safe?
I'm still very inexperienced with c++ and do not have the skills to determine this.
In my application, a weak_ptr
is being held as key in a map
and must be found first by the values. If it cannot be found, an uninitialized weak_ptr
is return
ed and used in map::count
.
Code
Setup
map<my_ptr, connection_data, owner_less<my_ptr>> m_connections;
typedef map<my_ptr, connection_data, owner_less<my_ptr>>::iterator it;
Find by data
my_ptr get_my_ptr_from_data(string data){
my_ptr my_ptr_to_send;
for(it iterator = my_ptrs.begin(); iterator != my_ptrs.end(); iterator++) {
if(iterator->second.data == data){
my_ptr_to_send = iterator->first;
break;
}
}
return my_ptr_to_send;
}
Finding
my_ptr found_ptr = get_my_ptr_from_data(data);
if(my_ptrs.count(found_ptr) ){
It's safe to call find
(and count
), as long as whatever ordering you've defined doesn't rely on the pointer being non-empty. The only thing that find
(and count
) will do with the argument is use it as an argument for the comparator.
However, it's not safe to use weak_ptr
as a key in an associative container. If it expires, then the container's order is broken, and trying to use the container afterwards will give undefined behaviour.
这篇关于调用map :: count用空的weak_ptr作为参数安全吗?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!