dplyr:即使没有选择它,也可以获取group_by-column [英] dplyr: getting group_by-column even when not selecting it

查看:120
本文介绍了dplyr:即使没有选择它,也可以获取group_by-column的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

当选择列时,我得到一列我没有选择,但它是一个group_by列:

When selecting columns I get one column I haven't selected but it's a group_by column:

library(magrittr)
library(dplyr)

df <- data.frame(i=c(1,1,1,1,2,2,2,2), j=c(1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2), x=runif(8))

df %>% 
  group_by(i,j) %>%
  summarize(s=sum(x)) %>%
  filter(i==1) %>%
  select(s)

我得到列,即使我没有选择它:

I get column i even I haven't selected it:

  i         s
1 1 0.8355195
2 1 0.9322474

为什么这发生了(为什么不列j?),我该如何避免呢?好的,我可以在开始时过滤....

Why does this happen (why not column j?) and how can I avoid it? Okay I could filter at the beginning....

推荐答案

这是因为默认情况下继承了分组变量。请参阅 dplyr 小插曲

That's because the grouping variable is carried on by default. Please see the dplyr vignette:


分组影响动词如下:分组 select()与未分组的 select()相同,但分组变量始终保留。

Grouping affects the verbs as follows: grouped select() is the same as ungrouped select(), except that grouping variables are always retained.

请注意(每个)总结剥离一层分组(在您的情况下, j ) ,所以在总结之后,您的数据仅按 i 分组,并将其输出到输出中。如果您不想要,可以在选择 s 之前取消分组数据:

Note that (each) summarize peels off one layer of grouping (in your case, j), so after the summarize, your data is only grouped by i and that is printed in the output. If you don't want that, you can ungroup the data before selecting s:

require(dplyr)
df %>% 
  group_by(i,j) %>%
  summarize(s=sum(x)) %>%
  ungroup() %>%
  filter(i==1) %>%
  select(s)
#Source: local data frame [2 x 1]
#
#         s
#1 1.129867
#2 1.265131

这篇关于dplyr:即使没有选择它,也可以获取group_by-column的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆