Visual Studio或Eclipse - 哪个更适合Windows上的Qt？ [英] Visual Studio or Eclipse - which one is better for Qt on Windows?

问题描述

Visual Studio或Eclipse - 哪个IDE在Windows上更适合Qt？

考虑到Eclipse是免费的，我对VS的Express版本特别感兴趣，但我对非免费版本开放如果这样可以更好地与Qt集成。

Visual Studio or Eclipse - which IDE is better for Qt on Windows?
Taking into account Eclipse is free I'm especially interested in Express version of VS but I'm open to non-free versions if this would allow much better integration with Qt.

在发布之前，您可以查看相似的问题，以便避免已经读了:)
寻找深入的答案。

Before posting you might take a look at similar questions on SO to avoid writing what I've already read :) Looking for in-depth answers.

推荐答案

我会扩大我的评论，问为什么Qt Creator不在您的列表中。

I'll expand on my comment asking why Qt Creator isn't on your list.

我有经验的MSVC，我已经在Linux上使用Eclipse进行一些C ++开发，并给它留下了深刻的印象。尽管我对这些工具的熟悉程度，我几乎已经决定使用Qt Creator进行基于Qt的工作。

I'm experienced with MSVC, and I've used Eclipse for some C++ development on Linux and been impressed with it. Despite my familiarity with these tools, I've pretty much settled on using Qt Creator for Qt based work.

Qt的信号和插槽范例实际上是一个语言扩展，一个Qt Creator非常易于使用：在编写connect（）语句时可以很好地实现代码完成功能，该语句可以智能地显示您正在连接的类的可用信号和插槽。

Qt's signals and slots paradigm is effectively a language extension, and one that Qt Creator makes very easy to use: there's great code-completion features while writing connect() statements that intelligently display the available signals and slots on the classes you are connecting.

帮助系统是很好的集成，与资源编辑器和窗体设计器的集成使它感觉有点像Visual Studio。

The help system is well integrated, the integration with the resource editor and the form designer makes it feel a little like Visual Studio too.

调试器适用于大多数目的，但缺乏使用MSVC进行调试的优点 - 对于某些错误，我不得不手动使用gdb。

The debugger is adequate for most purposes, but lacks the finesse of debugging with MSVC - for some bugs I've had to drop back to using gdb manually.

我缺少的另一件事是可以强加一些我的代码文件的虚拟组织。我不能在项目视图中将相关课程组合在一起。

The other thing I'm missing is the ability to impose some virtual organization of my code files. I can't group related classes together in the project view.

尽管有这些缺陷，我很喜欢它。检查出来！

But despite those flaws, I'm loving it. Check it out!

编辑：Eclipse和MSVC支持的改进都在 Qt Roadmap 。如果Qt Creator真的不适合你，我认为MSVC赢了，特别是如果你已经熟悉它了。

Edit: improvements to both Eclipse and MSVC support are on the Qt Roadmap. If Qt Creator really isn't for you, I think MSVC wins, particularly if you are already familiar with it.

这篇关于Visual Studio或Eclipse - 哪个更适合Windows上的Qt？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！