linux上的C ++开发Code :: Blocks，EMACS或GVIM [英] C++ development on linux Code::Blocks, EMACS or GVIM

问题描述

我不是在寻找IDE的C ++开发建议。我发现了很多讨论，并尝试了EMACS，GVIM和Code :: Blocks。我喜欢Code :: Blocks比其他两个。但是，大多数开发人员社区正在使用像EMACS或GVIM这样的工具。有没有理由呢？为什么Code :: Blocks少用？

我发现EMACS和GVIM不太用户友好。你必须付出更多的努力才能使它工作，但是Code :: Blocks在这里是有利的。它很容易启动和编译。或者我想念某些东西？

谢谢

解决方案

块使用较少，因为它不可扩展，因为Emacs& Vim的。在我使用不同的编程语言工作（Emacs）期间，我经常创建一个新的脚本，使我的工作更容易。 Code :: Blocks允许仅在C ++中编写扩展，这需要做很多工作。

I am not looking for an IDE suggestion for C++ development. I have found many discussions on that and tried EMACS, GVIM and Code::Blocks. I liked Code::Blocks very much than the other two. But it looks like most of the developer community is using tools like EMACS or GVIM. Is there a reason for this? Why Code::Blocks is less used?

I found EMACS and GVIM is less user friendly. You have to put more effort to get it working, but Code::Blocks take advantage here. It is easy to start and compile. Or do I miss something?

Thanks

解决方案

Code::Blocks is less used because it isn't extensible as Emacs & Vim. During my work (in Emacs) with different programming languages, i often create a new scripts that make my work much easier. Code::Blocks allows to write extensions only in C++, that requires to do lot of work.

这篇关于linux上的C ++开发Code :: Blocks，EMACS或GVIM的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！