所有电子邮件提供商是否忽略@之前的时段? [英] Do all email providers ignore periods in front of @?

查看:113
本文介绍了所有电子邮件提供商是否忽略@之前的时段?的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

我知道gmail允许用户在@符号之前在电子邮件地址中插入多个句点。 Gmail还允许用户附加如下的电子邮件地址:userName+anyStringHere@gmail.com。所有这些不同的电子邮件地址基本上是相同的地址。 (链接到描述这些功能的Google博客)

I know that gmail lets a user insert as many periods as he/she wants in an email address before the @ sign. Gmail also lets users append the email address like this: userName+anyStringHere@gmail.com. All those "different" email addresses are essentially the same address. (Link to google blog describing these "features")

我想阻止用户使用基本相同的电子邮件地址创建多个帐户。我决定将电子邮件地址存储在我的数据库中,这些时间段和以下内容包括一个+ sing stripped,但现在我想知道:是否忽略电子邮件提供商大多关注的@符号前面的时间段的标准? p>

I want to prevent users from creating multiple accounts with what is essentially the same email address. I decided to store email addresses in my database with those periods and anything following and including a + sing stripped, but now I am wondering: Is it a standard to ignore periods in front of the @ sign that email providers are mostly following?

推荐答案

这是Gmail特有的,但这适用于域的谷歌应用,所以你只能做到对于@ gmail.com

This is really specific to gmail, but this applies to google apps for domain as well, so you would only be able to do it for @gmail.com

我不会这样做,这只会疏远您的诚实用户,而不会阻止任何人决定创建多个帐户。

I wouldn't do this, this is only going to alienate your honest users and not prevent anyone determined to create multiple accounts.

这篇关于所有电子邮件提供商是否忽略@之前的时段?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆