为什么不使用erlang软件包？ [英] Why aren't erlang packages used?

问题描述

我发现有关 erlang中的软件包的页面。不仅我从来没有看到任何使用这个的代码，而且我以前还没有听说过。他们不在我所知道的任何书籍或教程中。是新的吗这只是一个概念还是提案？

I found this page about packages in erlang. Not only have I never seen any code that utilizes this, but I haven't even heard of them before. They aren't in any books or tutorials that I know of. Are they new? Was this just a concept or proposal?

如果没有使用，为什么不使用？如果还没有实现，是否有ETA？

If they aren't used, why not? If they aren't yet implemented, is there an ETA?

推荐答案

包已经实现，但是它们只是实验性的，主要是因为他们是否应该用这种语言来达成共识。许多人，包括我自己，觉得他们不值得的努力，不会真的增加很多的语言。其他人认为这个想法本身并不是那么糟糕，但这不是一个好办法。其他人想用语言看他们。没有ETA还没有。

Packages have been implemented but as yet they are only experimental, mainly because there is no consensus whether they should be in the language or not. Many, including myself, feel that they are not worth the effort and wouldn't really add much to the language. Others think that the idea itself is not so bad but that this is not a good way to do it. Others would like to see them in the language. No ETA as yet.

我的看法是尽量保持Erlang的小，不应该添加任何不能提供非常明显的好处的东西。而且我不认为这样做。虽然我没有那么说，对于你添加到语言的每个新功能，你应该删除某些东西。

My view is that every effort should be made to keep Erlang small and nothing should be added which doesn't provide a very clear benefit. And I don't think that packages do that. Although I haven't got as far as those who say that for every new feature you add to the language you should remove something.

无论如何，为什么他们没有提到在书籍等。

Anyway that is why they are not mentioned in books and such.

这篇关于为什么不使用erlang软件包？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！