Akamai的VS CloudFront的 [英] Akamai vs CloudFront

问题描述

什么是使用的好处 Akamai的与 CloudFront的？从我读过，Akamai的似乎是更昂贵，但他们似乎有一个更大的网络为他们的CDN。 CloudFront的另一端是新的和亚马逊甚至使用Akamai来时CloudFront的在2008年推出，这可能从那时起已经改变，不会让我感到惊讶自己的电子商务网站。

What are the advantages of using Akamai vs. CloudFront? From what I've read, Akamai seems to be more expensive but they seem to have a larger network for their CDN. CloudFront on the other end is newer and Amazon even used Akamai for their e-commerce site when CloudFront was launched in 2008. This might have changed since then which will not surprise me.

我喜欢CloudFront的，因为我的申请将被托管在AWS所以有可能是显著得益于使用CloudFront的，而不是Akamai的。 CloudFront的似乎是更好的记录也和他们的API是方便，而Akamai是不是。我希望能得到Akamai的选择与CloudFront的之间的利弊。在此先感谢！

I like CloudFront because my application will be hosted on AWS so there might be significant benefits from using CloudFront rather than Akamai. CloudFront seems to be better documented too and their API is easily accessible whereas Akamai isn't. I'm hoping to get pros and cons between choosing Akamai vs. CloudFront. Thanks in advance!

推荐答案

每个服务在不同地区执行不同。亚马逊的CloudFront的可以在亚太地区更好，而Akamai的可能会在欧洲南部和中东地区会更好。

Each service is performing differently in different regions. Amazon CloudFront can be better in the APAC region, while Akamai might be better in South of Europe and the Middle east.

由于这是取决于他们的PoP的实际位置的物理服务（点presence的）服务器，你需要测量，其中大多数用户都，并选择该区域的更好的服务。

Since this is a physical service that depends on the actual location of their PoP (Point of Presence) servers, you need to measure where most of your users are, and choose the better service for that region.

您可以看到这样的关于在这里不同地区的CDN性能的比较：<一href="http://media.amazonwebservices.com/FS_WP_AWS_CDN_CloudFront.pdf">http://media.amazonwebservices.com/FS_WP_AWS_CDN_CloudFront.pdf

You can see such a comparison about the CDN performance in different regions here: http://media.amazonwebservices.com/FS_WP_AWS_CDN_CloudFront.pdf

CloudFront的与Akamai之间的主要区别是PoP的服务器的数量。 CloudFront的使用超级PoP的办法，这意味着少得多的（边）位置（目前52），比较了Akamai拥有世界各地的数千人。这就是为什么CloudFront的成本低于Akamai的。

The main difference between CloudFront and Akamai is the number of PoP servers. CloudFront is using Super PoP approach, which means much fewer (edge) locations (52 currently), compare to the thousands that Akamai has around the world. This is why CloudFront costs less than Akamai.

拥有更多的PoP是在互联网发展的早期是至关重要的。但是，随着互联网的发展在世界各地的性能上的差别正在缩小。

Having more PoP was crucial in the early days of the Internet. But as the Internet is developing around the world the difference in performance is shrinking.

有针对超级流行在高速缓存方面甚至好处，因为有一个更好的机会发现在高速缓存中的一个元素，如果你有较少的缓存服务器。

There are even benefits for "Super PoP" in terms of cache, as there is a better chance of finding an element in the cache if you have fewer cache servers.

如果您是托管在EC2 Web服务器，你可能会得到来自CloudFront的更好的性能，必将更好的价格。如果没有，你应该检查各供应商之间的性能和价格。

If you are hosting your web servers in EC2, you will probably get better performance and surely better pricing from CloudFront. If not, you should check the performance and pricing between the various providers.

请注意，你不必是排他的，因为许多大的内容提供商正在使用多个CDN并没有一个。

Note that you don't have to be exclusive, as many big content providers are using several CDN and not a single one.

这篇关于Akamai的VS CloudFront的的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！