被捕获的异常本身就是null [英] Caught exception is null itself !

查看:211
本文介绍了被捕获的异常本身就是null的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

我有一个ASP.NET应用程序。一切都很好,但是最近我得到了自己空的例外:

  try 
{
//做某事
}
catch(Exception ex)
{
Logger.Log(尝试做某事时出错错误:+ ex.Message);
}

有时 ex



任何想法?

解决方案

对于这里的任何人,我找到了一个可以实现的实例(如果只在调试器中可以检测到)。 VS2013更新4。



Broken:



  try 
{
// do something
}
catch(WebException ex)//< - 这两个变量都命名为'ex'
{
Logger.Log(Error同时尝试做某事。错误:+ ex.Message);
}
catch(Exception ex)//< - 这个'ex'为null
{
Logger.Log(尝试做某事时出错错误: ex.Message);
}

解决方案是以不同的方式命名您的异常变量。



修正:



  try 
{
// do something
}
catch(WebException webEx)//< - all good in the hood
{
Logger.Log(Error while trying to do something。Error:+ webEx。信息); //< -
}
catch(Exception ex)//< - 这个'ex'正确地包含异常
{
Logger.Log(做某事。错误:+ ex.Message);
}


I have an ASP.NET applications. Everything was fine, but recently I get exceptions that are null themselves:

try
{
    // do something
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
    Logger.Log("Error while tried to do something. Error: " + ex.Message);
}

Sometimes ex is null itself !

Any idea?

解决方案

For anyone ending up here, I've found an instance where this is possible (If only detectable in the debugger). VS2013 Update 4.

Broken:

try
{
    // do something
}
catch (WebException ex) // <- both variables are named 'ex'
{
    Logger.Log("Error while tried to do something. Error: " + ex.Message);
}
catch (Exception ex) // <- this 'ex' is null
{
    Logger.Log("Error while tried to do something. Error: " + ex.Message);
}

The solution is to name your exception variables differently.

Fixed:

try
{
    // do something
}
catch (WebException webEx) // <- all good in the hood
{
    Logger.Log("Error while tried to do something. Error: " + webEx.Message); // <-
}
catch (Exception ex) // <- this 'ex' correctly contains the exception
{
    Logger.Log("Error while tried to do something. Error: " + ex.Message);
}

这篇关于被捕获的异常本身就是null的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆