两个宝石有相同的要求？ [英] Two gems share same require?

问题描述

当我打电话时：

  require'retryable'
  

这两个宝石冲突：

• https://github.com/robertsosinski/retryable


• https://github.com/carlo/retryable

因为他们都有一个'可重试'文件，他们要求用户要求。我有兴趣使用第一颗宝石，但这并不总是会发生。

这段代码是作为我自己的宝石的一部分执行的，它必须在所有用户中可靠。

如何解决此命名冲突？

如何解决命名冲突？

编辑：澄清，这是官方回购和宝石名称实际上是不同的（retryable-rb和carlo-retryable），但他们都要求他们的用户要求lib / retryable.rb文件与 require'retryable'

解决方案

您可以使用 gem 方法。

在这种情况下，您希望可重试-rb gem，而不是任何可能具有 retryable.rb 文件的其他人：

  gem'retryable-rb'＃激活相关的宝石
＃并将它的lib目录添加到加载路径
 
 require'retryable'＃从retryable-rb gem加载retryable.rb，因为
＃现在位于加载路径
  

When I call:

require 'retryable' 

These two gems clash:

• https://github.com/robertsosinski/retryable
• https://github.com/carlo/retryable

as they both have a 'retryable' file they ask the user to require. I'm interested in using the first gem, however this doesn't always happen.

This code is executed as a part of my own gem, and it has to be reliable across all users.

Is there a way to require specifically from a gem (as the gem names are different of course)?

How do I resolve this naming conflict?

EDIT: To clarify, this is the official repo and the gem names are actually different ("retryable-rb" and "carlo-retryable"), however they both ask their users to require the lib/retryable.rb file with require 'retryable'

解决方案

You can explicitly activate a specific gem with the gem method.

In this case you want the retryable-rb gem, and not any others that may have a retryable.rb file:

gem 'retryable-rb'   # activates the gem in question
                     # and adds its lib dir to load path

require 'retryable'  # loads retryable.rb from the retryable-rb gem, as it
                     # is now on the load path

这篇关于两个宝石有相同的要求？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！