Java数据传输对象命名约定？ [英] Java data transfer object naming convention?

问题描述

鉴于这种情况，你有一个客户端库传递给API的传输对象（POJO只有getter / setter），命名传输对象的最佳方法是什么？

Given this scenario where you have "transfer objects" (POJO's with just getters/setters) which are passed by a client library to your API, what is the best way to name the transfer objects?

package com.x.core; 

public class Car {
        private String make;
        private String model;

        public Car(com.x.clientapi.Car car) {
             this.make = car.getMake();
             this.model = car.getModel();
        }
}

在此示例中，您的主类和转移对象都是名称 Car 。它们有不同的包装，但我认为拥有相同的名称令人困惑。是否有关于如何命名传输对象的最佳实践？

In this example your main class and your transfer object both have the name Car. They are in different packages but I think it's confusing to have the same name. Is there a best practice on how to name the transfer objects?

推荐答案

我通常将'DTO'添加到类的末尾名称以及将所有DTO放在他们自己的包中。在您的示例中，我将其称为com.x.core.dto.CarDTO。

I generally add 'DTO' to the end of the Class name as well as place all the DTO's in their own package. In your example I would call it com.x.core.dto.CarDTO.

这篇关于Java数据传输对象命名约定？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！