生成正则表达式的所有有效值 [英] Generate all valid values for a regular expression

查看:98
本文介绍了生成正则表达式的所有有效值的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

我知道通过使用Xeger,我们可以获得指定模式的随机值。

I know by using Xeger, we can get a random value for a specified pattern.

String regex = "[0-9]{2}"; 
Xeger generator = new Xeger(regex);
String result = generator.generate();

我想知道有没有办法返回指定正则表达式的所有有效字符串。例如,对于pattern: [0-9] {2} ,我们可以从 00 获取所有值到 99

I want to know is there a way to return all of the valid strings for the specified regex. For example, for pattern: [0-9]{2}, we can get all of the values from 00 to 99.

谢谢

编辑:

这里我们不考虑像+和*这样的无限输出;我们如何获得有限正则表达式的所有值?

Here we don't consider the infinite outputs like + and *; how can we get all values for a finite regex?

最后修改:

谢谢大家!最后,我没有考虑所有可能的值,因为可能有数千个。我将一个特定的数字限制为减少数量的值的数量。

Thanks everyone! Finally I don't consider all the possible values as there may be thousands. I limit a specific number as the number of values to reduce the amount.

推荐答案

因为regexp是由有限状态机定义的,我想知道是否有一些东西可以在这样的机器上自动推理,这非常适合重新用于这项工作......并且 clojure.core.logic已交付

Since a regexp is defined by a finite state machine, I wondered if there was something out there able to automatically reason on such machines and that was a good fit to be repurposed for this work... and clojure.core.logic delivered

所以,我看了这个 regexp语法的定义(不幸的是,它缺少{}量词,但它们应该很容易添加到我的代码中)将它改编为java转义,并计算出这110行长的clojure程序:

So, I looked at this definition of the regexp grammar (unfortunately, it lacks the {} quantifiers, but they should be pretty easy to add to my code) adapted it to the java escapes, and worked out this 110 lines long clojure program:

(ns regexp-unfolder.core
  (:require [instaparse.core :as insta])
  (:require [clojure.core.logic :as l])
  (:require [clojure.set :refer [union difference]])
  (:gen-class :methods [#^{:static true} [unfold [String] clojure.lang.LazySeq]])
)

(def parse-regexp (insta/parser 
             "re = union | simple-re?
             union = re '|' simple-re
             simple-re = concat | base-re
             concat = simple-re base-re
             base-re = elementary-re | star | plus
             star = elementary-re '*'
             plus = elementary-re '+'
             elementary-re = group | char | '$' | any | set
             any = '.'
             group = '(' re ')'
             set = positive-set | negative-set
             positive-set = '['  set-items ']'
             negative-set = '[^' set-items ']'
             set-items = set-item*
             set-item = range | char
             range = char '-' char
             char = #'[^\\\\\\-\\[\\]]|\\.'" ))

(def printables (set (map char (range 32 127))))

(declare fns handle-first)

(defn handle-tree [q qto [ type & nodes]]
  (if (nil? nodes)
    [[q [""] qto]]
    ((fns type handle-first) q qto nodes)))

(defn star [q qto node &]
  (cons [q [""] qto]
         (handle-tree q q (first node))))

(defn plus [q qto node &] 
  (concat (handle-tree q qto (first node))
          (handle-tree qto qto (first node))))

(defn any-char [q qto & _] [[q (vec printables) qto]] )

(defn char-range [[c1 _ c2]]
  (let [extract-char (comp int first seq second)]
    (set (map char (range (extract-char c1) (inc (extract-char c2)))))))

(defn items [nodes]
  (union (mapcat
    (fn [[_ [type & ns]]]
      (if (= type :char)
        #{(first ns)}        
        (char-range ns)))
    (rest (second nodes)))))

(defn handle-set [q qto node &] [[q (vec (items node)) qto]])

(defn handle-negset [q qto node &] [[q (vec (difference printables (items node))) qto]])

(defn handle-range [q qto & nodes] [[q (vec (char-range nodes)) qto]])

(defn handle-char [q qto node &] [[q (vec node) qto]] )

(defn handle-concat [q qto nodes] 
  (let [syms (for [x  (rest nodes)] (gensym q))]
    (mapcat handle-tree  (cons q syms) (concat syms [qto] ) nodes)
  ))

(defn handle-first [q qto [node & _]] (handle-tree q qto node))

(def fns {:concat handle-concat, :star star, :plus plus, :any any-char, :positive-set handle-set, :negative-set handle-negset, :char handle-char})

(l/defne transition-membero
  [state trans newstate otransition]
  ([_ _ _ [state trans-set newstate]]
     (l/membero trans trans-set)))

(defn transitiono [state trans newstate transitions]
  (l/conde
   [(l/fresh [f] 
             (l/firsto transitions f)
             (transition-membero state trans newstate f))]
   [(l/fresh [r]
             (l/resto transitions r)
             (transitiono state trans newstate r))])
  )

(declare transitions)

;; Recognize a regexp finite state machine encoded in triplets [state, transition, next-state], adapted from a snippet made by Peteris Erins

(defn recognizeo
  ([input]
     (recognizeo 'q0 input))
  ([q input]
     (l/matche [input] ; start pattern matching on the input
        (['("")]
           (l/== q 'ok)) ; accept the empty string if we are in an accepting state
        ([[i . nput]]
           (l/fresh [qto]
                  (transitiono q i qto transitions) ; assert it must be what we transition to qto from q with input symbol i
                  (recognizeo qto nput)))))) ; recognize the remainder


(defn -unfold [regex] 
  (def transitions 
    (handle-tree 'q0 'ok (parse-regexp regex)))
  (map (partial apply str) (l/run* [q] (recognizeo q))))

使用core.logic编写,应该很容易使其适应作为正则表达式匹配器

Being written with core.logic, it should be fairly easy to adapt it to work also as a regexp matcher

我将printables字符限制在32到126之间ascii,否则处理正则表达式太麻烦了,比如 [^ c] ,但你可以很容易地扩展它...而且,我还没有实现但工会,可选模式以及字符类的\w,\s等转义

I limited the printables characters from 32 to 126 ascii, otherwise it'd be too cumbersome to deal with regexps such as [^c], but you can extend it quite easily... also, I haven't implemented yet unions, optional patterns, and the \w, \s, etc. escapes for character classes

这是我在clojure中写的最重要的事情,但基本看起来很好......一些例子:

This is the biggest thing I wrote in clojure up to now, but the basics seems to be covered just fine... some examples:

regexp-unfolder.core=> (-unfold "ba[rz]")
("bar" "baz")
regexp-unfolder.core=> (-unfold "[a-z3-7]")
("a" "b" "c" "d" "e" "f" "g" "h" "i" "j" "k" "l" "m" "n" "o" "p" "q" "r" "s" "t" "u" "v" "w" "x" "y" "z" "3" "4" "5" "6" "7")
regexp-unfolder.core=> (-unfold "[a-z3-7][01]")
("a0" "a1" "b0" "b1" "c0" "c1" "d0" "d1" "e0" "e1" "f0" "f1" "g0" "g1" "h0" "h1" "i0" "i1" "j0" "j1" "k0" "k1" "l0" "l1" "m0" "m1" "n0" "n1" "o0" "o1" "p0" "p1" "q0" "q1" "r0" "r1" "s0" "s1" "t0" "t1" "u0" "u1" "v0" "v1" "w0" "w1" "x0" "x1" "y0" "y1" "z0" "z1" "30" "31" "40" "41" "50" "51" "60" "70" "61" "71")
regexp-unfolder.core=> (-unfold "[^A-z]")
(" " "@" "!" "\"" "#" "$" "%" "&" "'" "(" ")" "*" "+" "," "-" "." "/" "0" "1" "2" "3" "4" "5" "6" "7" "8" "9" ":" ";" "{" "<" "|" "=" "}" ">" "~" "?")
regexp-unfolder.core=> (take 20 (-unfold "[abc]*"))
("" "a" "b" "c" "aa" "ab" "ac" "ba" "ca" "aaa" "bb" "cb" "aab" "bc" "cc" "aac" "aba" "aca" "baa" "caa")
regexp-unfolder.core=> (take 20 (-unfold "a+b+"))
("ab" "aab" "abb" "abbb" "aaab" "abbbb" "aabb" "abbbbb" "abbbbbb" "aabbb" "abbbbbbb" "abbbbbbbb" "aaaab" "aabbbb" "aaabb" "abbbbbbbbb" "abbbbbbbbbb" "aabbbbb" "abbbbbbbbbbb" "abbbbbbbbbbbb")

自从我这样开始,我实施了也是无限的输出:)

Since I started this way, I implemented also infinite outputs :)

如果有人有兴趣,我上传它在这里

显然,这是一个如何从普通旧Java调用展开的示例:

and obviously, here's an example of how to invoke unfold from plain old Java:

import static regexp_unfolder.core.unfold;

public class UnfolderExample{
    public static void main(String[] args){
        @SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
        Iterable<String> strings = unfold("a+b+");
        for (String s : strings){
            System.out.println(s);
        }
    }
}

这篇关于生成正则表达式的所有有效值的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆