使用HTTPClient或HttpUrlConnection？ [英] Use HTTPClient or HttpUrlConnection?

问题描述

我们正在JRE 1.4上实现REST客户端。

We're implementing a REST client on JRE 1.4.

似乎客户端REST框架的两个好选择是 HttpClient 和 HttpUrlConnection 。

Seems two good options for a client REST framework are HttpClient and HttpUrlConnection.

是否有理由在JRE的HttpUrlConnection上使用HttpClient？

Is there a reason to use HttpClient over the JRE's HttpUrlConnection?

推荐答案

<我会给你一个明确的理由来支持Apache的HTTPClient而不是JDK实现：JDK的 HttpUrlConnection 不支持超时*，Apache的HTTPClient支持。

I'll give you a single, concrete reason to favour Apache's HTTPClient over the JDK implementation: The JDK's HttpUrlConnection doesn't support timeouts*, Apache's HTTPClient does.

应用程序应始终能够在调用其他系统（数据库，远程服务，您自己的服务器后端......）时设置超时。

Applications should always have the ability to set timeouts when calling into other systems (databases, remote services, your own server backend, ...).

*这已在Java 1.5中修复; Java 1.5及更高版本支持HttpUrlConnection中的超时。

这篇关于使用HTTPClient或HttpUrlConnection？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！