Access开发人员在哪里？ [英] Where are the Access Developers?

问题描述

我想开一个关于行业现状的讨论。对于过去一年的

，我一直无法找到合格的Access开发者

可供租用。我很担心。


我觉得现在有很大的需求，那就是保持良好的开发人员忙碌的b
但这还不足以解释这种情况。

每当我发布一个Access工作时，我都会得到很多来自.NET的回复

开发人员，后端数据库人员和Web开发人员。他们都有我不是真正做Access应用程序开发的态度，

但访问很简单，所以我可以处理你的工作。 （不！）我得到的消息是，人们选择在.NET中构建自己的技能，在后期数据库工作中，以及在Web上开发，尽管市场在这些领域得到了很好的服务，但他们并没有足够快地建立他们的技能来满足需求。


如果确实发生了什么，我找不到一个好的解释

为什么。当然，Access有着轻量级的声誉，人们看不到它作为职业制造者的b $ b - 但情况一直如此，但不知何故

那里过去一直都有很多Access开发人员。什么

现在改变了？我不禁想知道Access的明星是否已经逐渐消失，这是求职者将其视为旧技术的原因。那将是耻辱，因为我认为在访问

失去市场利基之前需要很长时间。


无论如何，这些都是我的评论。我想知道其他Access专业人士是否已经做出类似（或相互冲突）的观察。

-TC

I''d like to open a discussion about the state of the industry. For the
past year, I''ve been unable to find competent Access developers
available for hire. I''m worried about that.

I think there''s great demand right now, and that''s keeping the good
developers busy, but that''s not enough to explain the situation.
Whenever I post an Access job, I get lots of responses from .NET
developers, back-end database people, and web developers. They all have
the attitude that "I don''t really do Access application development,
but Access is easy, so I can handle your job." (No!) The message I''m
getting is that people are choosing to build their skills in .NET, in
back-end database work, and in web development, even though the market
is well-served in those fields, but they aren''t building their skills
in Access fast enough to keep up with the demand.

If that is indeed what is happening, I can''t find a good explanation
why. Sure, Access has a lightweight reputation, and people don''t see it
as a career-maker -- but that has always been the case, yet somehow
there have always been plenty of Access developers in the past. What
has changed now? I can''t help but wonder if Access''s star has faded to
the point where job seekers eschew it as old technology. That would be
a shame, because I think it will be a very long time before Access
loses its market niche.

Anyway, those are my comments. I wonder if other Access professionals
have made similar (or conflicting) observations.
-TC

推荐答案

在我的计算机信息系统课程中，我的教师

似乎对Access的看法相当低。我们只教了足够的VBA来做一些非常基本的事情。我们没有学习更多关于Access的知识，而是学习了深入的.NET概念，并做了很多

..NET编码。访问类非常强调关系设计。

在上大学之前我曾经搞过Access，为我自己和其他人制作了一些简单的小型数据库，所以我毫不费力地完成了那些

课程。然而，很少提供

学习。


尽管如此，我还是被聘为Access开发人员。即使

凭借在大学教授的最低VBA技能，我也可以跳到

进入Access编程，因为程序设计教学了

通过.NET类。在我看来，更少的人打电话给他们自己开发虽然他们拥有必要的技能来完成你可能给他们的任务。一些技能是相同的没有
你使用的产品或语言是什么，而Access可以很容易地利用这些技能来获得b / b
。 VBA是如此容易学习，即使我在作为Access开发人员工作之前我没有使用过VB6，我还是会在一个内部使用它来获取它。几个星期。


因此，我认为你有一些被拒绝的.NET用户可能完全有资格继续工作

访问数据库，并且他们只是称自己为与访问开发者不同的
。

Throughout my courses in computer information systems my instructors
seemed to have a fairly low opinion of Access. We were taught just
enough VBA to do some extremely basic things. Instead of learning more
about Access, we were taught in-depth .NET concepts and did a lot of
..NET coding. Access classes had a heavy emphasis on relational design.
Before going to college I''d messed with Access before, making small,
uncomplicated databases for myself and others, so I went through those
courses without a hitch. However, there was very little offered for
learning.

Regardless of that, though, I was hired as an Access developer. Even
with the minimal VBA skills taught at the college I was able to jump
right in to Access programming because of the program design taught
through the .NET classes. It seems to me that fewer people are calling
themselves Access developers although they have the skills necessary to
accomplish the tasks you may give them. Some skills are the same no
matter what product or language you work with, and Access makes it easy
to capitalize on those skills. VBA is so easy to learn that even if I
hadn''t worked with VB6 prior to working as an Access developer, I would
have still picked it up within a couple weeks.

Therefore, it is my opinion that some of the .NET people you have
turned down may in fact be completely qualified for working on your
Access databases, and that they simply call themselves something
different than "Access developer".

" TC" <去********* @ yahoo.com>在消息中写道

news：11 ********************** @ g47g2000cwa.googlegr oups.com ...

"TC" <go*********@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:11**********************@g47g2000cwa.googlegr oups.com...

我想开一个关于行业现状的讨论。对于
去年，我一直无法找到合格的Access开发者
可供租用。我很担心。

我认为现在有很大的需求，那就是保持良好的开发人员的忙碌，但这还不够解释这种情况。
每当我发布一个Access工作时，我都会收到很多来自.NET开发人员，后端数据库人员和Web开发人员的回复。他们都有我不是真正做Access应用程序开发的态度，但访问很容易，所以我可以处理你的工作。 （不！）我得到的信息是人们选择在.NET，后端数据库工作和Web开发中建立自己的技能，即使市场也是如此/>在这些领域中得到了很好的服务，但他们并没有在Access中快速建立自己的技能以满足需求。

如果确实发生了这种情况，我找不到一个好的解释
为什么。当然，Access具有轻量级的声誉，人们不会把它看作是职业制造者 - 但情况一直如此，但不知何故
总是存在大量的Access开发人员过去。现在改变了什么？我不禁想知道Access的明星是否已经褪色，以至于求职者将其视为旧技术。那将是一种耻辱，因为我认为在访问
失去其市场利基之前还需要很长时间。

无论如何，这些都是我的评论。我想知道其他Access专业人员是否已经做出类似（或相互矛盾）的观察。

-TC

I''d like to open a discussion about the state of the industry. For the
past year, I''ve been unable to find competent Access developers
available for hire. I''m worried about that.

I think there''s great demand right now, and that''s keeping the good
developers busy, but that''s not enough to explain the situation.
Whenever I post an Access job, I get lots of responses from .NET
developers, back-end database people, and web developers. They all have
the attitude that "I don''t really do Access application development,
but Access is easy, so I can handle your job." (No!) The message I''m
getting is that people are choosing to build their skills in .NET, in
back-end database work, and in web development, even though the market
is well-served in those fields, but they aren''t building their skills
in Access fast enough to keep up with the demand.

If that is indeed what is happening, I can''t find a good explanation
why. Sure, Access has a lightweight reputation, and people don''t see it
as a career-maker -- but that has always been the case, yet somehow
there have always been plenty of Access developers in the past. What
has changed now? I can''t help but wonder if Access''s star has faded to
the point where job seekers eschew it as old technology. That would be
a shame, because I think it will be a very long time before Access
loses its market niche.

Anyway, those are my comments. I wonder if other Access professionals
have made similar (or conflicting) observations.
-TC

TC，

我没有足够的人力资源知识或经验来吸引

回答你的问题。尽管如此，如果您所描述的更改

可能并不能更好地表明您对技术人员的需求增加超过任何种类，我也不能不知道。减少供应量。通过仔细阅读招聘信息，我的

印象是，对于魅力的确有很多需求。 .NET等技能。我没有看到很多公司

寻找Access编码器。


-

Randy Harris
tech at promail dot com

我很确定我知道我记得的一切。

TC,

I don''t have a base of HR knowledge or experience upon which to draw to
answer your questions. I can''t help wondering, nonetheless, if the change
that you are describing might not be more indicative of an increase in your
demand for skilled people than any sort of reduction in the supply. My
impression, from perusing job postings, is that there is indeed a lot more
demand for "glamour" skills such as .NET. I don''t see a lot of companies
looking for Access coders.

--
Randy Harris
tech at promail dot com
I''m pretty sure I know everything that I can remember.

自从第一周verion 1.0发布后，我一直在使用Access

I''ve been using Access since the first week verion 1.0 was released for

这篇关于Access开发人员在哪里？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！