推荐FS [英] Recomended FS
问题描述
嗨
我正在升级数据库服务器硬件以及Linux操作系统。
我的问题是：
1.首选的FS是什么？ EXT3，Reiseref，JFS，XFS？ （速度，
效率）
2.硬件中最重要的部分是什么？快速高清，很多内存，
或者强大的cpu？
预付谢谢
--- -----------------------
Canaan Surfing Ltd.
互联网服务提供商
Ben-Nes Michael - 经理
电话：972-4-6991122
传真：972-4-6990098
http://www.canaan.net.il
----- ---------------------
--------------------- ------（播出结束）---------------------------
提示8：解释分析是你的朋友
Hi
I''m upgrading the DB sever hardware and also the Linux OS.
My Questions are:
1. What is the preferred FS to go with ? EXT3, Reiseref, JFS, XFS ? ( speed,
efficiency )
2. What is the most importent part in the Hardware ? fast HD, alot of mem,
or maybe strong cpu ?
Thanks in Advance
--------------------------
Canaan Surfing Ltd.
Internet Service Providers
Ben-Nes Michael - Manager
Tel: 972-4-6991122
Fax: 972-4-6990098
http://www.canaan.net.il
--------------------------
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
推荐答案
Ben-Nes Michael写道：
Ben-Nes Michael wrote:
嗨
我正在升级数据库服务器硬件以及Linux操作系统。
我的问题是：
1.首选FS是什么用？ EXT3，Reiseref，JFS，XFS？ （速度，效率）
这是一个火焰棒。人们从不同意他们的经历。除此之外
取决于你正在处理的是什么类型的数据库。
最好的选择是你自己的应用程序的基准。 Reiser / XFS / JFS都很好。 Ext3
需要选择合适的模式。它几乎同样好。你决定什么
最适合你..
2.硬件中最重要的部分是什么？快速高清，很多内存，或者可能是强大的cpu？
Hi
I''m upgrading the DB sever hardware and also the Linux OS.
My Questions are:
1. What is the preferred FS to go with ? EXT3, Reiseref, JFS, XFS ? ( speed,
efficiency )
Thats a flamebait. People never agree due to their experiences. Besides that
depends upon what kind of database you are dealing with.
Best bet is benchmark for your own app. Reiser/XFS/JFS are all good. Ext3
requires selection of proper mode. Its almost equally good. You decide what
works best for you..
2. What is the most importent part in the Hardware ? fast HD, alot of mem,
or maybe strong cpu ?
具有良好RAID控制器的快速高清。根据预算，SCSI比IDE更好买。
。硬件SCSI RAID也是如此。
Shridhar
----------------------- ----（广播结束）---------------------------
提示2：你可以得到使用取消注册命令立即关闭所有列表
（发送取消注册YourEmailAddressHere到 ma *** ****@postgresql.org ）
A fast HD with a good RAID controller. Subject to budget, SCSI are beter buy
than IDE. So does hardware SCSI RAID.
Shridhar
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
(send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to ma*******@postgresql.org)
2003年10月20日星期一，Shridhar Daithankar写道：
On Mon, 20 Oct 2003, Shridhar Daithankar wrote:
具有良好RAID控制器的快速HD。根据预算，SCSI比IDE更好买。硬件SCSI RAID也是如此。
A fast HD with a good RAID controller. Subject to budget, SCSI are beter buy
than IDE. So does hardware SCSI RAID.
我讨厌再问这个问题。但是为什么？
在15000RPM和更大的缓冲区旋转时，SCSI的增益是多少。他们在太空中输了
，而公交车则慢了。我想看一些专业人士。抱歉。
IDE硬盘40Gb 7200RPM = 133Mbs = 50UKP
SCSI硬盘36Gb 10000RPM = 160Mbs = 110UKP
额外的27Mbs值得另一个IDE磁盘。虽然你可以获得更大的更快的SCSI磁盘价格通过屋顶。它不再是RAID
而是RAED（冗余阵列的昂贵磁盘）
我的建议不是我有任何证据证明钱更好
花在一个好的磁盘控制器和许多磁盘上而不是每个磁盘上。
简而言之，如果你有钱可以燃烧，那么一定要拿到SCSI但是
大多数人都更善于消费
I hate asking this again. But WHY?
What SCSI gain in spinning at 15000RPM and larger buffers. They
lose in Space, and a slower bus. I would like to see some profe. Sorry.
IDE Hard Disk 40Gb 7200RPM = 133Mbs = 50UKP
SCSI Hard Disk 36Gb 10000RPM = 160Mbs = 110UKP
Is that extra 27Mbs worth another IDE Disk. and while you can get
bigger faster SCSI disks prices go through the roof. Its no longer RAID
but RAED (Redundant Array of Expensive Disks)
My advise not that I''ve got any proof is that the money is better
spent on a good disk controller and many disks than on each disk.
In short if you have money to burn then by all means get SCSI but
most people are better of spending
200磁盘控制器
这篇关于推荐FS的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
