在try块中抛出异常？ [英] Throwing exception in a try block?

问题描述

在try块中抛出异常是不好的编程设计然后

抓住它？

is it a bad programming design to throw exception in the try block then
catch it??

推荐答案

与if相比陈述，是的，非常糟糕。

Compared to an "if" statement, yes, very bad.

比较任何不好的东西。


希望我的拼贴画读这个。

凯文

穆罕默德 < [e-mail]>在消息中写道

news：11 ********************** @ l41g2000cwc.googlegr oups.com ...

Compare to anything it''s bad.

hope my collage read this.
Kevin
"Mohammad" <[e-mail]> wrote in message
news:11**********************@l41g2000cwc.googlegr oups.com...

与if相比陈述，是的，非常糟糕。

Compared to an "if" statement, yes, very bad.

嗨凯文，


取决于。例如，如果你有一个深度嵌套的过程，抛出一个

异常退出可能是一种可行的方法。

但是，通常抛出异常代价高昂且抛出异常

应该表示错误。


-

Miha Markic [MVP C＃] - RightHand .NET咨询&开发
www.rthand.com

SLODUG - 斯洛文尼亚开发者用户组 www.codezone-si.info

" Kevin Yu" < KO ** @ hotmail.com>在消息中写道

新闻：eU ************** @ TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl ...

Hi Kevin,

Depends. For example, if you have a deeply nested procedure, throwing an
exception to exit might be a viable way.
However, normally throwing an exception is costly plus throwing an exception
should signal an error.

--
Miha Markic [MVP C#] - RightHand .NET consulting & development
www.rthand.com
SLODUG - Slovene Developer Users Group www.codezone-si.info

"Kevin Yu" <ko**@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:eU**************@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...

这是一个糟糕的编程设计在try块中抛出异常然后抓住它？

is it a bad programming design to throw exception in the try block then
catch it??

这篇关于在try块中抛出异常？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！