Access 2003 [英] Access 2003
问题描述
我有一个使用Access 2002/2000的客户端（数据库本身是2000年写的
），并正在考虑迁移到Access 2003.任何
建议关于Access 2003是否值得迁移，或者他是否应该坚持2002年？
谢谢！
Neil
I have a client who is using Access 2002/2000 (the database itself is
written in 2000), and is considering migrating to Access 2003. Any
recommendations on whether Access 2003 is worth the migrate, or should he
stick with 2002?
Thanks!
Neil
推荐答案
如果要升级，我会去2003年，而不是2002年。帮助文件
是在2003年肯定比2000年或2002年更好。还增加了一些其他不错的
功能。 2000字段格式仍然是默认格式，2002文件
格式现在是2002/2003格式。以下是有关新的
功能的更多信息。
http://support.microsoft.com/default...roduct=acc2003
-
Wayne Morgan
MS Access MVP
" Neil Ginsberg" <是ne ** @ nrgconsult.com>在消息中写道
新闻：NX ***************** @ newsread2.news.pas.earthl ink.net ...
If you are going to upgrade, I would go to 2003, not 2002. The help files
are definately better in 2003 than 2000 or 2002. There are some other nice
features added. The 2000 field format is still the default and the 2002 file
format is now the 2002/2003 format. Here is more information on new
features.
http://support.microsoft.com/default...roduct=acc2003
--
Wayne Morgan
MS Access MVP
"Neil Ginsberg" <ne**@nrgconsult.com> wrote in message
news:NX*****************@newsread2.news.pas.earthl ink.net...
我有一个使用Access 2002/2000的客户端（数据库本身是在2000年编写的），并且正在考虑迁移到Access 2003.有关Access 2003是否值得迁移的任何建议，还是应该坚持2002年？
I have a client who is using Access 2002/2000 (the database itself is
written in 2000), and is considering migrating to Access 2003. Any
recommendations on whether Access 2003 is worth the migrate, or should he
stick with 2002?
" Wayne Morgan"写了
"Wayne Morgan" wrote
如果你要升级，我会去2003年，而不是2002年。帮助文件在2003年肯定比2000或2002更好。
我恭敬地不同意 - 帮助文件的_content_已经有点
（但IMNSHO只有一点点）有所改进，但帮助的用户界面是
憎恶。如果你不能轻易获得更好的内容是没用的。
还增加了一些其他不错的功能。
If you are going to upgrade, I would go to
2003, not 2002. The help files are definately
better in 2003 than 2000 or 2002.
I respectfully disagree -- the _content_ of the Help files has been somewhat
(but IMNSHO only somewhat) improved, but the user interface to help is an
abomination. The better content is useless if you cannot easily get to it.
There are some other nice
features added.
我的观察结果是Access 2002-2003之间几乎没有，非常非常少的特定于访问权限的更改，并且大部分更改是
办公室范围内的改进针对企业
企业环境的协作功能。
如果您不在公司企业环境中（在这种情况下，您的
专门的微软营销团队将用您的IT或
公司管理层进行升级），然后我认为很少有理由从Office 2002升级到
Office 2003系统。即使你已经安装了所有三个Access 2000的Service Packs
，要么是对
Access 2000的改进。 （可悲的是，我正在为一个系统上的一个客户做一些工作使用
Access 2000只安装了SP-1;幸运的是，它只有一次可能
把我咬在招标的地方，腐败并失去了对
表格的访问权。）
如果我理解了原来的帖子，升级会来自Access
2002（Office XP）到Access 2003（Office 2003系统），所以我的建议是，
不要浪费你的时间和精力"如果所有用户都拥有Access 2002，那么我没有看到以Access 2000格式保存数据库的任何优势。
Larry Linson
Microsoft Access MVP
My observation is that there were few, very, very few, Access-specific
changes between Access 2002-2003, and that the bulk of the changes were
Office-wide improvements to collaboration features aimed at the corporate
enterprise environment.
If you are not in the corporate enterprise environment (in which case, your
dedicated Microsoft marketing team will be making the case with your IT or
corporate management to upgrade), then I see very little reason to upgrade
from Office 2002 to Office 2003 System. Either would be an improvement over
Access 2000, even if you have all three of Access 2000''s Service Packs
installed. (Sadly, I am doing some work for one client on a system using
Access 2000 that only has SP-1 installed; fortunately, it has only possibly
one time "bit me in the tender places", corrupting and losing access to a
Form.)
And, if I understood the original post, the upgrade would be from Access
2002 (Office XP) to Access 2003 (Office 2003 System), so my advice would be,
"Don''t waste your time and energy." If all the users have Access 2002, I
don''t see any advantage in saving your DB in Access 2000 format.
Larry Linson
Microsoft Access MVP
>而且，如果我理解原始帖子，升级将从Access
> And, if I understood the original post, the upgrade would be from Access
2002（Office XP）到Access 2003（Office 2003系统），所以我的建议将是
be，Don 不要浪费你的时间和精力。如果所有用户都拥有Access 2002，那么在使用Access 2000格式保存数据库方面没有任何优势。
2002 (Office XP) to Access 2003 (Office 2003 System), so my advice would be, "Don''t waste your time and energy." If all the users have Access 2002, I
don''t see any advantage in saving your DB in Access 2000 format.
拉里。<实际上，大约一半的用户拥有A2000，另一半拥有A2002。
也许更重要的是，数据库本身是用A2000编写的，而我'使用
A2000（作为唯一的开发者）。所以进入A2003将是重要的，它会统一版本（虽然有些可能会留在2002年，我想）
并且会升级开发版本本身。
另一方面，我的另一个客户正在寻求将带有ODBC链接到SQL Server 7.0的MDB前端转换为ADP文件。对此有什么想法，
一般情况下，以及关于A2003？
谢谢，
Neil
顺便问一下，你有没有尝试过WD Tate的新自助葡萄？它看起来像是潜水，但它是一个相当不错的中式自助餐。
Hi, Larry.
Actually, about half the users have A2000, and the other half have A2002.
Perhaps more significantly, the db itself is written in A2000, and I''m using
A2000 (as the sole developer). So going to A2003 would be significant in
that it would unify the version (though some may stay at 2002, I suppose)
and would upgrade the development version, itself.
On another note, another client of mine is looking to convert an MDB front
end with ODBC links to SQL Server 7.0 to an ADP file. Any thoughts on that,
both in general, and in regard to A2003?
Thanks,
Neil
By the way, have you tried the new Buffet Grapevine up on W.D. Tate? It
looks like a dive, but it''s a pretty decent Chinese buffet.
这篇关于Access 2003的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
