Access 2002 vs. 2003 [英] Access 2002 vs. 2003
问题描述
我们正在运行带有SQL 7后端的Access 2000 MDB。我们的网络人员是升级到Windows Server 2003并希望同时升级Office和SQL Server
。我们正在转向SQL Server 2005，因为他已经拥有了Office Pro 2002的
许可证，所以他希望升级到那个。
我我们一直在说我们需要升级到Access 2003，而不是2002年，即使
Office保留在2002年。我们也希望做相当数量的
我们的应用程序的重新开发，我想在2003年完成它。
我是否适合在2002年坚持Access 2003，或者没有那么多
的区别？如果存在显着差异，我可以在
支持获取Access 2003的许可证吗？
谢谢！
Neil
Neil写道：我们正在运行带有SQL 7后端的Access 2000 MDB 。我们的网络人员正在升级到Windows Server 2003，并希望同时升级Office和SQL Server。我们正在转向SQL Server 2005，并且由于他已经拥有Office Pro 2002的许可证，他想升级到那个。
我一直在说我们需要升级到Access 2003，而不是2002年，即使Office保留在2002年。我们也希望对我们的应用程序进行大量的重新开发，我想在2003年完成。
我是否适合在2002年坚持Access 2003，或者没有那么多差异？如果存在显着差异，我可以说是否支持获取Access 2003的许可证？
谢谢！
Neil
2003系列提供了超过2002版本的几个修复。
-
Joe Obergfell
Web开发人员
谢谢，乔。具体来说，你知道那些修正案是什么吗？或者是否有一个列出它们的
网站？
网络人员会说这些修补程序应该是可用的服务
包到2002年。你知道这是不是真的吗？
谢谢！
Neil
" Joe Obergfell" < Ob的********* @ gmail.com>在消息中写道
新闻：％2 **************** @ TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl ...Neil写道：我们正在运行带有SQL 7后端的Access 2000 MDB。我们的网络人员正在升级到Windows Server 2003，并希望同时升级Office和SQL
服务器。我们正在转向SQL Server 2005，而且，由于他已经拥有Office Pro 2002的许可证，他想升级到那个。
我一直在说我们需要升级到Access 2003，而不是2002年，甚至
如果Office保留在2002年。我们也希望对我们的应用程序进行大量的重新开发，我想在2003年完成。
我是否适合在2002年坚持使用Access 2003，或者没有那么多的差异？如果存在显着差异，我可以说什么来支持获取Access 2003的许可证？
谢谢！
Neil2003系列提供了多个2002版本的修复。
-
Joe Obergfell
Web开发人员
Neil写道：谢谢，乔。具体来说，你知道那些修正案是什么吗？或者是否有一个列出它们的网站？
网络人员会说修复程序应该作为服务提供到2002年。你知道吗？这是真的吗？
谢谢！
Neil
Joe Obergfell < Ob的********* @ gmail.com>在消息中写道
新闻：％2 **************** @ TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl ...Neil写道：我们正在运行带有SQL 7后端的Access 2000 MDB。我们的网络人员正在升级到Windows Server 2003，并希望同时升级Office和SQL
服务器。我们正在转向SQL Server 2005，而且，由于他已经拥有Office Pro 2002的许可证，他想升级到那个。
我一直在说我们需要升级到Access 2003，而不是2002年，甚至
如果Office保留在2002年。我们也希望对我们的应用程序进行大量的重新开发，我想在2003年完成。
我是否适合在2002年坚持使用Access 2003，或者没有那么多的差异？如果存在显着差异，我可以说什么来支持获取Access 2003的许可证？
谢谢！
Neil2003系列提供了多个2002版本的修复。
-
Joe Obergfell
Web开发人员
我不确定修复程序是什么，但它们是主要修复程序。我相信如果你去微软Office的网站然后去Access，你应该
能够搜索修复程序。网络人员是对的，
从2002年到2003年的这些修复将作为2002年的服务包，但是为了节省时间，2003年会更快。
这可能是时间与价格的关系。我不确定是否有价格差异的价格，但是如果有的话，你会花时间支付，如果
没有价格。
-
Joe Obergfell
网页开发者
We are running an Access 2000 MDB with a SQL 7 back end. Our network guy is
upgrading to Windows Server 2003 and wants to upgrade Office and SQL Server
at the same time. We''re moving to SQL Server 2005, and, since he already has
licenses for Office Pro 2002, he wants to upgrade to that.
I''ve been saying that we need to upgrade to Access 2003, not 2002, even if
Office is kept at 2002. We are also looking to do a fair amount of
redevelopment of our application, and I want to do it in 2003.
Am I right for insisting on Access 2003 over 2002, or is there not that much
of a difference? If there is a significant difference, what can I say in
support of getting licenses for Access 2003?
Thanks!
Neil
Neil wrote:We are running an Access 2000 MDB with a SQL 7 back end. Our network guy is
upgrading to Windows Server 2003 and wants to upgrade Office and SQL Server
at the same time. We''re moving to SQL Server 2005, and, since he already has
licenses for Office Pro 2002, he wants to upgrade to that.
I''ve been saying that we need to upgrade to Access 2003, not 2002, even if
Office is kept at 2002. We are also looking to do a fair amount of
redevelopment of our application, and I want to do it in 2003.
Am I right for insisting on Access 2003 over 2002, or is there not that much
of a difference? If there is a significant difference, what can I say in
support of getting licenses for Access 2003?
Thanks!
Neil
The 2003 series has provided several fixes over the 2002 version.
--
Joe Obergfell
Web Developer
Thanks, Joe. Do you know, specifically, what those fixes are; or is there a
web site that lists them?
The network guy will say that the fixes should be available as a service
pack to 2002. Do you know if that''s true?
Thanks!
Neil
"Joe Obergfell" <Ob*********@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:%2****************@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...Neil wrote:We are running an Access 2000 MDB with a SQL 7 back end. Our network guy
is upgrading to Windows Server 2003 and wants to upgrade Office and SQL
Server at the same time. We''re moving to SQL Server 2005, and, since he
already has licenses for Office Pro 2002, he wants to upgrade to that.
I''ve been saying that we need to upgrade to Access 2003, not 2002, even
if Office is kept at 2002. We are also looking to do a fair amount of
redevelopment of our application, and I want to do it in 2003.
Am I right for insisting on Access 2003 over 2002, or is there not that
much of a difference? If there is a significant difference, what can I
say in support of getting licenses for Access 2003?
Thanks!
Neil
The 2003 series has provided several fixes over the 2002 version.
--
Joe Obergfell
Web Developer
Neil wrote:Thanks, Joe. Do you know, specifically, what those fixes are; or is there a
web site that lists them?
The network guy will say that the fixes should be available as a service
pack to 2002. Do you know if that''s true?
Thanks!
Neil
"Joe Obergfell" <Ob*********@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:%2****************@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...Neil wrote:We are running an Access 2000 MDB with a SQL 7 back end. Our network guy
is upgrading to Windows Server 2003 and wants to upgrade Office and SQL
Server at the same time. We''re moving to SQL Server 2005, and, since he
already has licenses for Office Pro 2002, he wants to upgrade to that.
I''ve been saying that we need to upgrade to Access 2003, not 2002, even
if Office is kept at 2002. We are also looking to do a fair amount of
redevelopment of our application, and I want to do it in 2003.
Am I right for insisting on Access 2003 over 2002, or is there not that
much of a difference? If there is a significant difference, what can I
say in support of getting licenses for Access 2003?
Thanks!
Neil
The 2003 series has provided several fixes over the 2002 version.
--
Joe Obergfell
Web Developer
I am not sure what the fixes are, but they were major fixes. I believe
if you go to Microsoft Office''s site and then to Access, you should be
able to search for what the fixes have been. The network guy is right,
These fixes from 2002 to 2003 will be as service packs for 2002, but to
save time, 2003 would be quicker.
It is all a matter of time vs possible price. I am not sure if there is
a difference in price but if there is, you would pay through time, if
not in price.
--
Joe Obergfell
Web Developer
这篇关于Access 2002 vs. 2003的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
