为什么Linux和开源很糟糕 [英] Why Linux and open source sucks
问题描述
开源程序一般也很糟糕。这里有一些关于为什么像Linux，PHP，MYSQL和
等其他开源程序这样的项目很糟糕的事实......
- Linux只是一个操作系统的克隆超过20年
旧的类似于DOS（Unix）。这就是所有的Linux。内核被采取了，b / b
反击，并由Linus自己偷走。这是事实。 Xerox
应该起诉，但在1991年初期，没有人真的使用Unix和施乐有更好的关系来使用它们
recources比起起诉某人施加什么样的Xerox
并不关心。 （即：你可以在网上下载很多旧游戏
，这些都是在商店里出售的，但是这些公司不会因为这些游戏过去而需要关注
他们现在赚钱了，所以他们真的不在乎他们会发生什么事情。
- 其他开源项目是MySQL，PHP ，Perl，Apache，Mozilla ..
这些是Web服务和数据库等业务的关键组件。
当微软较小时（大约90年代中期），这些产品在性能和可用性方面被杀死了。他们是服务的最佳选择，而且MS有更酷的版本
同样没有人喜欢或使用的东西。
- 最终，微软的资金和权力都在增长。他们用Windows 2000这样的新操作系统出来了，然后事情开始发生变化。
MS的SQL Server 2000开始击败Oracle，IBM DB2，
和MySQL是速度和性能。人们开始注意到这一点并开始迁移到SQL Server 2000.请记住
业务和全世界都基于这4个数据库。
- iis 5.0和ASP于2000年重新发布，再一次，
基准吸引了竞争。他们*杀死了* Java，并击败了
PHP。一本独立的杂志用PHP，asp和JSP开发了识别电子商务网站（比如这个）。
JSP - 每秒17页。
PHP - 每秒54页
asp - 每秒80页（加速代码和压缩程序
最多160页）
那段时间的公司突然出现在Linux上。一个是红帽Linux的b
$ b。这是一个严肃的努力，使操作系统与Microsoft Windows竞争
。 Poeple将数百万美元投入Red Hat股票。
因为当时所有高科技公司都热销。
请记住，Red Hat是GNU。因此，他们必须在每个赠送或销售的产品上提供他们的
源代码。实际上，他们的
产品在未来的商店被出售以获取利润，我向你保证，如果你编译他们的代码，他们的法律年将会在你之后出现
并将其出售以获取利润。
事实上，Red Hat原来是一个非常糟糕，缓慢的操作系统。它有很多
功能，但它们根本不起作用（即：它们的即插即用）。
星空办公室出现了，结果证明是一辆非常多的车，差劲，
和*极其*慢的Office套件。
到2000+和XP，Microsoft IIS 6.0和.NET，微软现在是
查杀*任何*开源项目的性能，可靠性和
易用性。甲骨文最近宣布，如果您使用他们的产品，您可能不会发布基准测试。 （那是因为他们知道他们现在是最慢的数据库）。
最近在一年一度的黑客攻击/骚扰中，参赛者进入了
和本周的人会试图入侵
服务器。一个是Microsoft运行IIS 6.0。有超过
80,000次黑客攻击，而且没有一个人可以进入。他们
韩元。基于Linux的系统被立即入侵。
但是，Red Hat。 BSD，Linux确实有Apache。而且他们还有一个非常非常重要的事情要让他们成为dB和网络服务的好选择： - >他们不是微软。
???你问了吗？
好吧，一旦你像我一样整天和网络管理员说话，
有一个*很好的理由去BSD ，Linux路由。
有一件事可以让这些更差，更慢的操作系统和服务保持活力
并且在行业中使用：
病毒不会对它们起作用。
Open source programs in general suck pretty bad also. Here are some
loose facts regarding why projects like Linux, PHP, MYSQL, and
other open source programs suck:
- Linux is simply a clone of an operating system over 20 years
old similar to DOS (Unix). That''s ALL Linux is. The kernal was taken,
decompiled, and stolen by Linus himself. That''s a fact. Xerox
should have sued, but at the during the early 1991, no one was
really using Unix and Xerox had better things to do with their
recources than to sue someone steeling something what Xerox
doesnt care about. (ie: You can download lots of old games online
that were sold in stores, but these companies don''t
care cause these games were in the past and don''t currently make
them money so they really don''t care what happens to them).
- Other open source project are MySQL, PHP, Perl, Apache, Mozilla..
These are key components of business such as web serving and database.
When Microsoft was smaller (around mid 90''s), these products killed
Microsoft in performance and usablility. They were
the top choice for services and MS had crappier versions of the
same thing which no one liked or used.
- Eventually, Microsoft grew in money and power. They came out
with new OS''s like Windows 2000 and then things began to change.
MS''s SQL Server 2000 started beating out Oracle, IBM DB2,
and MySQL is speed and performance. People started to notice
this and began to migrate over to SQL Server 2000. Remeber that
business and the world are based off these 4 databases.
- iis 5.0 and ASP was realeased in 2000 and once again, the
benchmarks smoked competition. They *killed* Java, and beat out
PHP. An independant magazine developed identicle e-Commerce
web sites (like this) in PHP, asp, and JSP.
JSP - 17 pages per second.
PHP - 54 pages per second
asp - 80 pages per second (and with acceleated code and compression
was up to 160 pages)
Companies around that time popped up to push for Linux. One was
Red Hat Linux. This was a serious effort to make an OS to compete
with Microsoft Windows. Poeple poured millions into Red Hat stock.
Cause at that time, ALL high tech companies where hot.
Remember, Red Hat is GNU. Thus, they have to give you their
source code on each product given away or sold. In reality, their
products were being sold at future shop for profit and i assure you,
their lawyears would be coming after you if you compiled their code
and sold it for profit.
Fact is, Red Hat turned out to be a very poor, slow OS. It had many
features, but they simply didn''t work (ie: their plug and play).
Star Office emerged and turned out to be a very buggy, poor,
and *extremely* slow Office suite.
By 2000+ and XP, Microsoft IIS 6.0 and .NET, Microsoft is now
killing *any* open source project in performance, reliability, and
ease of use. Oracle recently announced that you may NOT
publish benchmarks if you use their product. (that''s because they
know they are now the slowest database).
Recently at a yearly hacking/sercurtiy confrence, contestants entered
and people over the week would try to hack into the
servers. One was Microsoft running IIS 6.0. There were over
80,000 hack attempts and not one person could get in. They
won. Linux based systems were hacked into instantly.
However, Red Hat. BSD, Linux does have Apache. And they also
have one very, very, important thing going for them to make them a
good choice for dB and web services: -> They are NOT Microsoft.
??? you ask?
Well, once you get to speak to network admins all day like I do,
there is a *good* reason to go the BSD, Linux route. There is
one thing that keeps these poorer, slower OS''s and services alive
and used in the industry:
Viruses don''t work on them.
推荐答案
这会以什么方式与这个群体相关？
-
使用M2，Opera的革命性电子邮件客户端： http://www.opera.com/m2/
And this would be relevant to this group in what way?
--
Using M2, Opera''s revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/
寻求帮助......适用于生产环境Linux / FreeBSD仍然规则...
" Mike" < MI ********* @ hotmail.com>在留言中写道
新闻：E4 ******************* @ news04.bloor.is.net.cab le.rogers.com .. 。
Seek help... for production environment Linux/FreeBSD still rule...
"Mike" <mi*********@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:E4*******************@news04.bloor.is.net.cab le.rogers.com...
开源程序一般也很糟糕。以下是一些关于为什么像Linux，PHP，MYSQL和其他开源程序这样的项目很糟糕的事实：
- Linux只是20多个操作系统的克隆好几年与DOS（Unix）相似。这就是所有的Linux。内纳斯被自己带走了，被反编译并被偷走了。这是事实。施乐应该起诉，但是在1991年初，没有人真正使用Unix，施乐与他们的资源有更好的关系，而不是起诉某人施加什么施乐Xerox <不关心。 （即：你可以在网上下载很多旧的游戏
在商店里出售，但是这些公司并不关心因为这些游戏过去并且目前还没有制作
他们真的不知道他们会发生什么事情。
- 其他开源项目是MySQL，PHP，Perl，Apache，Mozilla ......
这些是关键组件网络服务和数据库等业务。
当微软规模较小（大约90年代中期）时，这些产品在性能和可用性方面都扼杀了微软。他们是服务的首选，MS拥有同样的东西，没有人喜欢或使用过的更糟糕的版本。
- 最终，微软在金钱和权力方面都有所增长。他们出现了像Windows 2000这样的新操作系统，然后情况开始发生变化。
MS的SQL Server 2000开始击败Oracle，IBM DB2，而且MySQL速度很快和表现。人们开始注意到这一点并开始迁移到SQL Server 2000.请记住，商业和世界都基于这4个数据库。
- iis 5.0和ASP是2000年再次发布，
基准吸引了竞争。他们*杀死了* Java，并击败了PHP。独立杂志在PHP，asp和JSP中开发了相同的电子商务网站（如此）。
JSP - 每秒17页。
PHP - 每页54页第二页
asp - 每秒80页（加密代码和压缩速度高达160页）
公司在那个时候突然出现推动Linux。一个是红帽Linux。这是一个认真的努力，使操作系统与Microsoft Windows竞争。 Poeple将数百万美元投入Red Hat股票。
因为当时所有高科技公司都热门。
请记住，Red Hat是GNU。因此，他们必须在每个赠送或销售的产品上提供他们的源代码。实际上，他们的产品在未来的商店被出售以获取利润，我向你保证，如果你编写代码并将其出售以获利，他们的法律年将会追随你。
星际办公室出现了，结果证明是一个非常大的车，穷人，
和*非常*慢的办公套件。
到2000+和XP，Microsoft IIS 6.0和.NET，微软现在在性能，可靠性和易用性。 Oracle最近宣布，如果您使用他们的产品，您可能不会发布基准测试。 （那是因为他们知道他们现在是最慢的数据库）。
最近在一年一度的黑客攻击/骚扰中，参赛者进入了
，本周人们会尝试入侵服务器。一个是Microsoft运行IIS 6.0。有超过8万次黑客攻击，没有一个人可以进入。他们赢了。基于Linux的系统被立即入侵。
然而，Red Hat。 BSD，Linux确实有Apache。他们还有一个非常非常重要的事情要让他们成为dB和网络服务的良好选择： - >他们不是微软。
???你问了吗？
嗯，一旦你像我一样整天和网络管理员说话，
有一个*很好的理由去BSD，Linux路线。有一件事可以使这些较差，较慢的操作系统和服务保持活跃并在行业中使用：
病毒不会对它们起作用。
Open source programs in general suck pretty bad also. Here are some
loose facts regarding why projects like Linux, PHP, MYSQL, and
other open source programs suck:
- Linux is simply a clone of an operating system over 20 years
old similar to DOS (Unix). That''s ALL Linux is. The kernal was taken,
decompiled, and stolen by Linus himself. That''s a fact. Xerox
should have sued, but at the during the early 1991, no one was
really using Unix and Xerox had better things to do with their
recources than to sue someone steeling something what Xerox
doesnt care about. (ie: You can download lots of old games online
that were sold in stores, but these companies don''t
care cause these games were in the past and don''t currently make
them money so they really don''t care what happens to them).
- Other open source project are MySQL, PHP, Perl, Apache, Mozilla..
These are key components of business such as web serving and database.
When Microsoft was smaller (around mid 90''s), these products killed
Microsoft in performance and usablility. They were
the top choice for services and MS had crappier versions of the
same thing which no one liked or used.
- Eventually, Microsoft grew in money and power. They came out
with new OS''s like Windows 2000 and then things began to change.
MS''s SQL Server 2000 started beating out Oracle, IBM DB2,
and MySQL is speed and performance. People started to notice
this and began to migrate over to SQL Server 2000. Remeber that
business and the world are based off these 4 databases.
- iis 5.0 and ASP was realeased in 2000 and once again, the
benchmarks smoked competition. They *killed* Java, and beat out
PHP. An independant magazine developed identicle e-Commerce
web sites (like this) in PHP, asp, and JSP.
JSP - 17 pages per second.
PHP - 54 pages per second
asp - 80 pages per second (and with acceleated code and compression
was up to 160 pages)
Companies around that time popped up to push for Linux. One was
Red Hat Linux. This was a serious effort to make an OS to compete
with Microsoft Windows. Poeple poured millions into Red Hat stock.
Cause at that time, ALL high tech companies where hot.
Remember, Red Hat is GNU. Thus, they have to give you their
source code on each product given away or sold. In reality, their
products were being sold at future shop for profit and i assure you,
their lawyears would be coming after you if you compiled their code
and sold it for profit.
Fact is, Red Hat turned out to be a very poor, slow OS. It had many
features, but they simply didn''t work (ie: their plug and play).
Star Office emerged and turned out to be a very buggy, poor,
and *extremely* slow Office suite.
By 2000+ and XP, Microsoft IIS 6.0 and .NET, Microsoft is now
killing *any* open source project in performance, reliability, and
ease of use. Oracle recently announced that you may NOT
publish benchmarks if you use their product. (that''s because they
know they are now the slowest database).
Recently at a yearly hacking/sercurtiy confrence, contestants entered
and people over the week would try to hack into the
servers. One was Microsoft running IIS 6.0. There were over
80,000 hack attempts and not one person could get in. They
won. Linux based systems were hacked into instantly.
However, Red Hat. BSD, Linux does have Apache. And they also
have one very, very, important thing going for them to make them a
good choice for dB and web services: -> They are NOT Microsoft.
??? you ask?
Well, once you get to speak to network admins all day like I do,
there is a *good* reason to go the BSD, Linux route. There is
one thing that keeps these poorer, slower OS''s and services alive
and used in the industry:
Viruses don''t work on them.
生产？ Linux; ROFL，我们使用QNX
" Maziar Aflatoun" <毫安*** @ rogers.com>在消息中写道
新闻：Bp ******************** @ news02.bloor.is.net.ca ble.rogers.com。 ..
production ? Linux ; ROFL, we use QNX
"Maziar Aflatoun" <ma***@rogers.com> wrote in message
news:Bp********************@news02.bloor.is.net.ca ble.rogers.com...
寻求帮助......对于生产环境Linux / FreeBSD仍然统治...
迈克 < MI ********* @ hotmail.com>在消息中写道
新闻：E4 ******************* @ news04.bloor.is.net.cab le.rogers.com ...
Seek help... for production environment Linux/FreeBSD still rule...
"Mike" <mi*********@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:E4*******************@news04.bloor.is.net.cab le.rogers.com...
开源程序一般也很糟糕。以下是一些关于为什么像Linux，PHP，MYSQL和其他开源程序这样的项目很糟糕的事实：
- Linux只是20多个操作系统的克隆好几年与DOS（Unix）相似。这就是所有的Linux。内纳斯被自己带走了，被反编译并被偷走了。这是事实。施乐应该起诉，但是在1991年初，没有人真正使用Unix，施乐与他们的资源有更好的关系，而不是起诉某人施加什么施乐Xerox <不关心。 （即：你可以在网上下载很多旧的游戏
在商店里出售，但是这些公司并不关心因为这些游戏过去并且目前还没有制作
他们真的不知道他们会发生什么事情。
- 其他开源项目是MySQL，PHP，Perl，Apache，Mozilla ......
这些是关键组件网络服务和数据库等业务。
当微软规模较小（大约90年代中期）时，这些产品在性能和可用性方面都扼杀了微软。他们是服务的首选，MS拥有同样的东西，没有人喜欢或使用过的更糟糕的版本。
- 最终，微软在金钱和权力方面都有所增长。他们出现了像Windows 2000这样的新操作系统，然后情况开始发生变化。
MS的SQL Server 2000开始击败Oracle，IBM DB2，而且MySQL速度很快和表现。人们开始注意到这一点并开始迁移到SQL Server 2000.请记住，商业和世界都基于这4个数据库。
- iis 5.0和ASP是2000年再次发布，
基准吸引了竞争。他们*杀死了* Java，并击败了PHP。独立杂志在PHP，asp和JSP中开发了相同的电子商务网站（如此）。
JSP - 每秒17页。
PHP - 每页54页第二页
asp - 每秒80页（加密代码和压缩速度高达160页）
公司在那个时候突然出现推动Linux。一个是红帽Linux。这是一个认真的努力，使操作系统与Microsoft Windows竞争。 Poeple将数百万美元投入Red Hat股票。
因为当时所有高科技公司都热门。
请记住，Red Hat是GNU。因此，他们必须在每个赠送或销售的产品上提供他们的源代码。实际上，他们的产品在未来的商店被出售以获取利润，我向你保证，如果你编写代码并将其出售以获利，他们的法律年将会追随你。
星际办公室出现了，结果证明是一个非常大的车，穷人，
和*非常*慢的办公套件。
到2000+和XP，Microsoft IIS 6.0和.NET，微软现在在性能，可靠性和易用性。 Oracle最近宣布，如果您使用他们的产品，您可能不会发布基准测试。 （那是因为他们知道他们现在是最慢的数据库）。
最近在一年一度的黑客攻击/骚扰中，参赛者进入了
，本周人们会尝试入侵服务器。一个是Microsoft运行IIS 6.0。有超过8万次黑客攻击，没有一个人可以进入。他们赢了。基于Linux的系统被立即入侵。
然而，Red Hat。 BSD，Linux确实有Apache。他们还有一个非常非常重要的事情要让他们成为dB和网络服务的良好选择： - >他们不是微软。
???你问了吗？
嗯，一旦你像我一样整天和网络管理员说话，
有一个*很好的理由去BSD，Linux路线。有一件事可以使这些较差，较慢的操作系统和服务保持活跃并在行业中使用：
病毒不会对它们起作用。
Open source programs in general suck pretty bad also. Here are some
loose facts regarding why projects like Linux, PHP, MYSQL, and
other open source programs suck:
- Linux is simply a clone of an operating system over 20 years
old similar to DOS (Unix). That''s ALL Linux is. The kernal was taken,
decompiled, and stolen by Linus himself. That''s a fact. Xerox
should have sued, but at the during the early 1991, no one was
really using Unix and Xerox had better things to do with their
recources than to sue someone steeling something what Xerox
doesnt care about. (ie: You can download lots of old games online
that were sold in stores, but these companies don''t
care cause these games were in the past and don''t currently make
them money so they really don''t care what happens to them).
- Other open source project are MySQL, PHP, Perl, Apache, Mozilla..
These are key components of business such as web serving and database.
When Microsoft was smaller (around mid 90''s), these products killed
Microsoft in performance and usablility. They were
the top choice for services and MS had crappier versions of the
same thing which no one liked or used.
- Eventually, Microsoft grew in money and power. They came out
with new OS''s like Windows 2000 and then things began to change.
MS''s SQL Server 2000 started beating out Oracle, IBM DB2,
and MySQL is speed and performance. People started to notice
this and began to migrate over to SQL Server 2000. Remeber that
business and the world are based off these 4 databases.
- iis 5.0 and ASP was realeased in 2000 and once again, the
benchmarks smoked competition. They *killed* Java, and beat out
PHP. An independant magazine developed identicle e-Commerce
web sites (like this) in PHP, asp, and JSP.
JSP - 17 pages per second.
PHP - 54 pages per second
asp - 80 pages per second (and with acceleated code and compression
was up to 160 pages)
Companies around that time popped up to push for Linux. One was
Red Hat Linux. This was a serious effort to make an OS to compete
with Microsoft Windows. Poeple poured millions into Red Hat stock.
Cause at that time, ALL high tech companies where hot.
Remember, Red Hat is GNU. Thus, they have to give you their
source code on each product given away or sold. In reality, their
products were being sold at future shop for profit and i assure you,
their lawyears would be coming after you if you compiled their code
and sold it for profit.
Fact is, Red Hat turned out to be a very poor, slow OS. It had many
features, but they simply didn''t work (ie: their plug and play).
Star Office emerged and turned out to be a very buggy, poor,
and *extremely* slow Office suite.
By 2000+ and XP, Microsoft IIS 6.0 and .NET, Microsoft is now
killing *any* open source project in performance, reliability, and
ease of use. Oracle recently announced that you may NOT
publish benchmarks if you use their product. (that''s because they
know they are now the slowest database).
Recently at a yearly hacking/sercurtiy confrence, contestants entered
and people over the week would try to hack into the
servers. One was Microsoft running IIS 6.0. There were over
80,000 hack attempts and not one person could get in. They
won. Linux based systems were hacked into instantly.
However, Red Hat. BSD, Linux does have Apache. And they also
have one very, very, important thing going for them to make them a
good choice for dB and web services: -> They are NOT Microsoft.
??? you ask?
Well, once you get to speak to network admins all day like I do,
there is a *good* reason to go the BSD, Linux route. There is
one thing that keeps these poorer, slower OS''s and services alive
and used in the industry:
Viruses don''t work on them.
这篇关于为什么Linux和开源很糟糕的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
