标准 [英] Standards

问题描述

我不确定我是否正确地提出这个问题，如果它是

正确的地方可以问它，但在这里它是：


关于网站说标准是否正确：


对于PC，此软件最适合使用Internet Explorer

6.02或更高版本以及Netscape 7.1或以后。对于MAC OS 10.3.1或更高版本

使用MAC Netscape 7.1或MAC Safari 1.2.1（1.25.1）。对于Linux使用

Netscape 7.1。


考虑到这是一个公共机构的页面...将

根据一些商定的标准，你会发现一个上面引用的页面可以声称是
吗？

感谢您的评论。


Geo


PS：有问题的页面是//catalogue.calgarypubliclibrary.com/

解决方案

" GEO" [e-mail] 写道：

我不确定我是否正确地提出这个问题，如果是<请问它是正确的地方，但在这里它是：

对于一个网站来说，标准是否正确：

对于PC，这个软件可行最好使用Internet Explorer 6.02或
以后和Netscape 7.1或更高版本。对于MAC OS 10.3.1或更高版本，请使用MAC Netscape 7.1或MAC Safari 1.2.1（1.25.1）。对于Linux使用
Netscape 7.1。


我绝不会说效果最好。在我的页面上的声明。为什么？

因为他们在*所有*浏览器中工作... PDA ...移动电话......

考虑到这是公共机构的页面.. 。你会发现一个上面引用的页面可以声称是遵循一些商定的标准吗？


Ahem。你必须先编写一些标准代码。


< http://validator.w3.org/check?verbose = 1& uri = http％3A // catalogue.calgarypubliclibrary.com />


该页面上有201个错误。从那里开始。

感谢您的评论。

地理

PS：有问题的页面是//catalogue.calgarypubliclibrary.com/

为了使其成为可点击的链接，我们不需要复制和粘贴：

< http://catalogue.calgarypubliclibrary。 com />


-

-bts

-这个空间故意留空。

Beauregard T. Shagnasty <一个********* @ example.invalid>。写道：

我不会把效果最好的在我的页面上的声明。为什么？
因为他们在*所有*浏览器中工作

嗯，是的，但是效果最好。或优化的或_really_代表

''我们只查看''上的页面。


-

Yucca， http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/

有关网页制作的网页： http：// www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/www.html

2005年1月26日星期三04:56:03 GMT， " GEO" [e-mail] 写道：

说一个网站是否正确标准：


No.

考虑到这是公共机构的页面...


谁经常是最糟糕的罪犯，但是如果有挑战性的话，那就是防守反应和防守，而不是非常高兴和无知，因为这是一个很好的。

会
你发现上面引用的一个页面可以声称是遵循一些商定的标准吗？

不，恰恰相反。事实上，它说我们不遵循标准，

但我们之后看了它，在这些浏览器中它并没有完全支持
/>

I am not sure if I am putting this question correctly, and if it is
the right place to ask it, but here it goes:

Is it correct standards-wise to say about a site:

"For PCs this software works best with Internet Explorer
6.02 or later and Netscape 7.1 or later. For MAC OS 10.3.1 or higher
use MAC Netscape 7.1 or MAC Safari 1.2.1 (1.25.1). For Linux use
Netscape 7.1."

Considering that this is the page of a public institution... Would
you find that a page that says the quote above can claim to be
following some agreed upon standards?
Thank for you comments.

Geo

PS: The page in question is //catalogue.calgarypubliclibrary.com/

解决方案

"GEO" [e-mail] wrote:

I am not sure if I am putting this question correctly, and if it is
the right place to ask it, but here it goes:

Is it correct standards-wise to say about a site:

"For PCs this software works best with Internet Explorer 6.02 or
later and Netscape 7.1 or later. For MAC OS 10.3.1 or higher use
MAC Netscape 7.1 or MAC Safari 1.2.1 (1.25.1). For Linux use
Netscape 7.1."
I would not ever put a "works best" statement on my pages. Why?
Because they work in *all* browsers... PDAs... mobile phones...
Considering that this is the page of a public institution... Would
you find that a page that says the quote above can claim to be
following some agreed upon standards?
Ahem. You must first code to some standards.

<http://validator.w3.org/check?verbose=1&uri=http%3A//catalogue.calgarypubliclibrary.com/>

That page has 201 errors on it. Begin there.
Thank for you comments.

Geo

PS: The page in question is //catalogue.calgarypubliclibrary.com/

To make that a clickable link so we don''t have to copy and paste:
<http://catalogue.calgarypubliclibrary.com/>

--
-bts
-This space intentionally left blank.

"Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.*********@example.invalid> wrote:

I would not ever put a "works best" statement on my pages. Why?
Because they work in *all* browsers

Well, yes, but "works best" or "optimized for" _really_ stands for
''we only looked at the pages on''.

--
Yucca, http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/
Pages about Web authoring: http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/www.html

On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 04:56:03 GMT, "GEO" [e-mail] wrote:

Is it correct standards-wise to say about a site:
No.
Considering that this is the page of a public institution...
Who are frequently the worst offenders, but react pompously and
defensively if challenged, rather than cheerfully and ignorantly as
the Flashbunnies do.
Would
you find that a page that says the quote above can claim to be
following some agreed upon standards?

No, quite the opposite. In fact it says "We don''t follow standards,
but we looked at it afterwards and in these browsers it wasn''t
completely b0rken"

这篇关于标准的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！