微软和.NET VS世界 [英] Microsoft and .NET VS The World
问题描述
请注意，这篇文章不打算开始讨论.NET和其他竞争对手技术的优点。
相反，我非常欣赏的是参考文章，白色
论文等，确实展示了每个文章的优点;任何比较，
等 - 并希望从客观来源（或至少是理性的处理
的问题）。多年来，我听到一些人宣传开源
，而不是供应商特定的解决方案（通常是微软是相关供应商的b / b
）。然而，每当我询问一位辩护律师并问他们时，他们就会提出简单的问题，例如，你有没有必要进入并修改Linux
内核;或者你真的会这样做，如果你对Linux的某些方面感到不满意吗？我从未得到过理性的回应。更典型的是我在比尔盖茨和其他情感口头禅中获得个人镜头，而这些口头禅并没有说明实际的优点。所以，我正在寻找任何可能被视为主题的客观处理的东西：开源与。微软
解决方案，或.NET vs J2EE，或者ASP.NET / SQL Server与PHP / MySQL解决方案，
IIS与Apache等等。
谢谢！
哦，如果有任何巨魔想要对此作出回应，请限制你自己使用
向我提供支持你观点的理性材料的参考
of view。同样，这篇文章并不打算成为对b / b
的实际讨论的相对优点。请提供参考资料。
我建议你不要找到你想要的东西
这里，主要是因为大多数参与者都倾向于.NET。
我还建议你真的不会找到任何真正的东西
来自任何行业来源的目标，再次，因为它们会有偏见，
（某种方式），在某种程度上。
在我看来，我认为客观的唯一来源是
acedemia，其中A v B的研究可能是作为
$ b $的一部分进行的b硕士或博士论文。理论上。从你的时区我假设你在北美东部大衣上是b $ b，所以，如果我是你，我会考虑制作
询问其中一个CalTech或UC校园。
" Jeremy S." < GS@NoSpam.net>在留言中写道
新闻：ek ************** @ TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl ...请注意这篇文章是不是*打算在.NET和其他竞争对手的技术优点之间展开讨论。
相反，我非常欣赏的是参考文章，白色
论文等确实表现出每个人的优点;任何比较，
等 - 并希望从客观来源（或至少是对问题的合理处理）。多年来我听到一些人宣传开源。与特定于供应商的解决方案（通常是Microsoft是相关供应商）相比。然而，每当我质疑一个
倡导者并问他们简单的问题时，你有没有必要进入
并修改Linux内核;或者，如果你对Linux的某些方面不满意，你会不会真的这样做？我从来没有得到过合理的回应。更典型的是，我在比尔盖茨和其他情感口号中获得个人镜头，而这些口头禅与实际的优点并不相符。所以，我正在寻找可能被视为对主题的客观处理的任何事情：开源与微软解决方案，或.NET与J2EE，或
ASP.NET / SQL Server与PHP / MySQL解决方案，IIS与Apache等等。
谢谢！
哦，如果有任何巨魔想对此作出回应，请将自己限制在
向我提供了支持你的观点的理性材料。同样，这篇文章并不打算成为相对优点的实际讨论。请参考。
Jeremy，
我完全同意Stephany的说法，你发现的变化是客观
答案几乎是不可能的。
当人们看到你的问题时，他们从那里开始做这件事，
哪个可以是均匀的。 让所有人保持原样
在我看来，你必须为自己设定一个话题，例如你发现如果你找到了b $ b互联网有一个未来，什么是最完整的操作系统
服务器/桌面/手持平台使用。比你可以做出决定
表并在互联网上搜索可以回答你的
问题的文件。
当你从未来有什么开始主观和与时间相关的答案比你可能得到的还要多。
只有我的想法，
Cor
圣吸！你对我发现任何
*目标*话语的可能性都是正确的。但是*理性*话语呢？ （或者这些是同一枚硬币的两面吗？）。
我们在一个领域（IT）工作并不令人惊讶一个典型的条目
点是一个与计算机*科学*有关的学位，并且有很多理性思考必须用于成功设计
决定;大量的演绎推理和一小部分归纳推理-----当谈到选择技术时，我们可以实施我们的宏伟计划对于EMOTIONAL的决策???
感谢您确认我一直以来的想法。
顺便说一句：这对整体有什么看法"拖钓"事情？ Trolls必须是我们中最情绪化的一些
！也许Phil博士可以特别关注
感情上发育不良的计算机科学家以及成为一个好的b $ b $ troll。
" ; Cor Ligthert <无************ @ planet.nl>在消息中写道
news：eD ************** @ TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl ...Jeremy，
我完全赞同Stephany，你找到一个客观答案的变化几乎是不可能的。
当人们看到你的问题，而不是从那里看，
哪些都可以。 让所有人保持原样。
在我看来，你必须为自己设定一个主题，例如，如果你发现互联网有未来，什么是最完整的OS服务器/桌面/手持平台使用。你可以制作一个
decission table并在互联网上搜索可以回答你的问题的文件。
当你开始使用未来有什么时比你可能只得到非常主观和时间相关的答案。
只有我的想法，
Cor
Please note that this post is *not* intended to start any discussion between
the merits of .NET and other rival technologies.
Rather, what I would greatly appreciate are references to articles, white
papers, and the like that do present the merits of each; any comparisons,
etc - and hopefully from objective sources (or at least a rational treatment
of the issues). For years I have heard some people promoting "open source"
in contrast to vendor-specific solutions (typically Microsoft is the
relevant vendor). Yet whenever I have questioned an advocate and ask them
simple questions like, "have you ever had to go in and modify the Linux
kernel; or would you ever actually do that if you were unhappy with some
aspect of Linux?" I have never gotten a rational response. More typically I
get personal shots at Bill Gates and other emotional mantra that doesn''t
speak to the actual merits. So, I''m looking for anything that might be
considered an objective treatment of the topics: open source vs .Microsoft
solutions, or .NET vs J2EE, or ASP.NET/SQL Server vs PHP/MySQL solutions,
IIS vs Apache, etc.
Thanks!
Oh, and if any trolls want to respond to this, please limit yourselves to
providing me with references to rational materials that support your point
of view. Again, this post is not intended to become an actual discussion of
the relative merits. Just references, please.
I would suggest that you''re not going to find what you are looking for in
here, mainly because most of the participants have a slant toward .NET.
I would also suggest that you''re not really going to find anything really
objective from any ''industry'' sources, again, because they will be biased,
(one way or the other), to some degree.
In my view, the only sources that I would consider to be objective would be
acedemia where studies of A v B may have been carried out as part of a
Masters or Ph.D. thesis. Theoretically. From your timezone I assume you are
on the East Coat of North America so, if I were you, I would consider making
inquires of one of the CalTech or UC campuses.
"Jeremy S." <GS@NoSpam.net> wrote in message
news:ek**************@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...Please note that this post is *not* intended to start any discussion
between the merits of .NET and other rival technologies.
Rather, what I would greatly appreciate are references to articles, white
papers, and the like that do present the merits of each; any comparisons,
etc - and hopefully from objective sources (or at least a rational
treatment of the issues). For years I have heard some people promoting
"open source" in contrast to vendor-specific solutions (typically
Microsoft is the relevant vendor). Yet whenever I have questioned an
advocate and ask them simple questions like, "have you ever had to go in
and modify the Linux kernel; or would you ever actually do that if you
were unhappy with some aspect of Linux?" I have never gotten a rational
response. More typically I get personal shots at Bill Gates and other
emotional mantra that doesn''t speak to the actual merits. So, I''m looking
for anything that might be considered an objective treatment of the
topics: open source vs .Microsoft solutions, or .NET vs J2EE, or
ASP.NET/SQL Server vs PHP/MySQL solutions, IIS vs Apache, etc.
Thanks!
Oh, and if any trolls want to respond to this, please limit yourselves to
providing me with references to rational materials that support your point
of view. Again, this post is not intended to become an actual discussion
of the relative merits. Just references, please.
Jeremy,
I agree completly with Stephany that the change that you find an objective
answer is almost impossible.
When people look at your problem, than they do it from there perspective,
which can be even. "Let all stay the same as it is".
In my opinion would you have to set a topic for yourself, by instance if you
find that Internet has a future, "what would than be the most complete OS
Server/Desktop/Handheld platform to use". Than you can make a decission
table and search the Internet for documents that give answers on your
questions.
When you start with "What has the future" than you probably get only very
subjective and time related answers.
Only my thought,
Cor
Holy Smokes! You are both right about the likelihood of me finding any
*objective* discourse. But what about *rational* discourse? (or are these
two sides of the same coin?).
Isn''t it amazing that we work in a field (IT) for which a typical entry
point is a degree having to do with computer *science* and that there is a
whole lot of rational thought that must go into making successful design
decisions; lots of deductive reasoning and a smattering of inductive
thought ----- YET when it comes to a choice of technology with which to
implement our grand schemes it comes down to EMOTIONAL decision-making???
Thanks for confirming what I thought all along.
BTW: What does this say about the whole "troll" thing? Trolls must be some
of the most emotional amongst us! Maybe Dr. Phil could do a special on
"emotionally stunted computer scientists and the gratification of being a
troll."
"Cor Ligthert" <no************@planet.nl> wrote in message
news:eD**************@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...Jeremy,
I agree completly with Stephany that the change that you find an objective
answer is almost impossible.
When people look at your problem, than they do it from there perspective,
which can be even. "Let all stay the same as it is".
In my opinion would you have to set a topic for yourself, by instance if
you find that Internet has a future, "what would than be the most complete
OS Server/Desktop/Handheld platform to use". Than you can make a
decission table and search the Internet for documents that give answers on
your questions.
When you start with "What has the future" than you probably get only very
subjective and time related answers.
Only my thought,
Cor
这篇关于微软和.NET VS世界的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
