礼貌的问题 [英] A matter of being polite
问题描述
大家好
我对那些花时间回答他们提出的问题的人所表现出的技术专长水平给我留下了深刻的印象。
知识渊博的同事。大多数问题似乎以一种有用的，适度的方式回答，并且提供了一条路线，即
提问者可以通过自己的蝙蝠取得进一步的进展。这很好。
没有人有义务回答这个新闻组的问题。因此，我们必须始终感激人们愿意花一个小时左右的时间
这样做。
然而，有一些贡献者似乎很高兴采取
小便或者是彻头彻尾的粗鲁。不是每个人都可以成为JavaScript的专家，
或任何其他语言。事实上，绝大多数人都不会成为专家。这就是为什么成为一名专家是特殊的，以及为什么要尊重专业知识。
但作为专家会带来自己的责任 - 分享和
传递已经获得的知识;这样做是为了鼓励其他人下次为自己做得更好。有一些贡献者（不过是一小撮，谢天谢地），他们似乎认为
专家的作用是让提问者感觉很小，不够
和傻瓜。
当我学习我的第一个程序语言（Modula-2，那些是
天！）时，我被告知最好的程序员是那些提出问题的程序员，并且专家程序员是那些从他们收到的答案中学到的东西。
我想在某个地方有一个FAQ ...
你的
Ian Sedwell博士
Hi guys
I am impressed by the level of technical expertise demonstrated by many of
the individuals who take time out to answer questions posed by their
less-knowledgeable colleagues. Most questions seem to be answered in a
manner that is helpful, modest and providing of a route whereby the
questioner can make further progress off their own bat. That is good.
No one is obliged to answer questions on this newsgroup. So we must always
be grateful that people are willing to spend an hour or so of their time
doing so.
However, there are a few contributors who seem to take delight in taking the
piss or being downright rude. Not everyone can be an expert in JavaScript,
or any other language for that matter. Indeed, the great majority will not
be expert. That''s why being an expert is special, and why expertise is to be
respected.
But being an expert brings its own responsibility - that of sharing and
passing on the knowledge that has been gained; and doing so in such a manner
that it inspires others to do better for themselves next time. There are
some contributors (no more than a handful, thankfully) who seem to think
that the role of an expert is to leave questioners feeling small, inadequate
and stupid.
When I was learning my first program language (Modula-2, ah those were the
days!), I was told that the best programmers are those that ask questions,
and that the expert programmers were those that learned from the answers
they received.
I guess there''s an FAQ on it somewhere...
Yours
Dr Ian Sedwell
推荐答案
2004年9月6日星期一23:29:38 +0000（UTC），Ian Sedwell
< ; IA ********* @ btclick.com>写道：
On Mon, 6 Sep 2004 23:29:38 +0000 (UTC), Ian Sedwell
<ia*********@btclick.com> wrote:
我被告知最优秀的程序员是那些提出问题的人，而且专家程序员是那些从他们收到的答案中学到的东西。
I was told that the best programmers are those that ask questions,
and that the expert programmers were those that learned from the answers
they received.
啊是的，但那是垃圾，提问和学习
是如何成为专家程序员，只是问不会让你
一个。同样通过询问来回答微不足道的问题
谷歌强调你没有成为
程序员所必需的技能。
当然，许多clj问题来自那些不是b
$ b程序员，并且从不想成为的人，而且很多回复都不是
特别礼貌，但这是一个单独的问题。
Jim。
Ah yeah, but that''s a load of rubbish, asking questions and learning
is how to be become expert programmers, just asking does not make you
one. Equally asking questions that are trivial to answer by asking
Google highlights that you do not have the skills essential to being a
programmer.
Of course many of the clj questions are from people who aren''t
programmers, and never want to be, and many of the responses aren''t
particularly polite, but that''s a seperate issue.
Jim.
" Jim Ley"写道：
''......但这是一堆垃圾''
''......强调你没有技能成为一名必不可少的b
程序员''
对我来说，Ian的怪物之一已经抬起头来......
Oeyvind
-
http://home.online.no/~oeyvtoft/ToftWeb/
" Jim Ley" < ji*@jibbering.com> skrev i melding
news：41 *************** @ news.individual.net ...
"Jim Ley" wrote:
''...but that''s a load of rubbish''
''...highlights that you do not have the skills essential to being a
programmer''
Seem to me one of Ian`s ng monsters has already lifted its head...
Oeyvind
--
http://home.online.no/~oeyvtoft/ToftWeb/
"Jim Ley" <ji*@jibbering.com> skrev i melding
news:41***************@news.individual.net...
On Mon，6 2004年9月23:29:38 +0000（UTC），Ian Sedwell
< ia ********* @ btclick.com>写道：
On Mon, 6 Sep 2004 23:29:38 +0000 (UTC), Ian Sedwell
<ia*********@btclick.com> wrote:
我被告知最优秀的程序员是那些提出问题的人，而且专家程序员是那些从他们收到的答案中学到的东西。
I was told that the best programmers are those that ask questions,
and that the expert programmers were those that learned from the answers
they received.
是啊，但那是垃圾，提问和学习
是如何成为专家程序员，只是要求不会让你成为一个。同样通过询问来回答微不足道的问题
Google强调说你没有成为一名
程序员所必需的技能。
当然，许多clj问题来自那些不是程序员，从不想做的人，很多回答都不是特别礼貌，但这是一个单独的问题。
Jim。
Ah yeah, but that''s a load of rubbish, asking questions and learning
is how to be become expert programmers, just asking does not make you
one. Equally asking questions that are trivial to answer by asking
Google highlights that you do not have the skills essential to being a
programmer.
Of course many of the clj questions are from people who aren''t
programmers, and never want to be, and many of the responses aren''t
particularly polite, but that''s a seperate issue.
Jim.
在文章< kl ****************** @ news2.e.nsc .no>， oe******@online.no
启发我们...
In article <kl******************@news2.e.nsc.no>, oe******@online.no
enlightened us with...
" Jim Ley"写道：
''...但那是一堆垃圾''
''......强调你没有必要的技能来成为一个
程序员''
对我来说，Ian的怪物之一已经抬起头了......
"Jim Ley" wrote:
''...but that''s a load of rubbish''
''...highlights that you do not have the skills essential to being a
programmer''
Seem to me one of Ian`s ng monsters has already lifted its head...
你忘记了重要的部分报价。我知道你并不是故意的。
同样通过询问来回答微不足道的问题
谷歌强调你没有成为一名
程序员必不可少的技能。
如果有人不能花时间做一个简单的GIS，我们为什么要采取
为他们代码的时间是免费的吗？
只是问。
-
-
~kaeli~
有点粗鲁和不尊重可以提升无意义的
互动与意志之战并增添戏剧性否则为沉闷的一天。
http：// www.ipwebdesign.net/wildAtHeart
http：//www.ipwebdesign .net / kaelisSpace
You forgot the important part of the quote. I know you didn''t mean to.
"Equally asking questions that are trivial to answer by asking
Google highlights that you do not have the skills essential to being a
programmer."
If someone can''t take the time to do a simple GIS, why should we take the
time to code for them, for free?
Just asking.
--
--
~kaeli~
A little rudeness and disrespect can elevate a meaningless
interaction to a battle of wills and add drama to an
otherwise dull day.
http://www.ipwebdesign.net/wildAtHeart
http://www.ipwebdesign.net/kaelisSpace
这篇关于礼貌的问题的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
