巫语选择？ （PHP或asp.net） [英] Witch language to choose? (PHP or asp.net)
问题描述
大家好，
我有点问题我给了一个项目在线制作
购物系统专业理发店。但是我用巫婆语言制作了一个很小的问题。
我的选择是PHP，但我听到很多人认为asp.net是
更好更稳定。
所以我问你对asp.net和PHP的体验是什么。
谢谢你，
Warnar
我注意到Message-ID：< 01 *****来自warstar的***************************@4ax.com>
包含以下内容：
我有点问题我给了一个专业理发店制作在线购物系统的项目。
我认为PHP肯定比其他产品更好 - 使用它并且你将会花费大量时间来减少开发时间。你可以跑一杆，但是一些人可能会变得粗糙。一定要修剪你的代码然后它就不会花费很长时间才能找到你的错误。很快就会把它作为一个DA来紧缩。
-
Geoff Berrow（把它发给电子邮件）
它只是Usenet，没有人死。
我的意见，而不是委员会的，我的。
简单的RFD http://www.ckdog.co.uk/rfdmaker/
warstar< wa ***** @ NSA.ml>在消息中写道
news：< 01 ******************************** @ 4ax .COM取代。 ..
我有点问题我给了一个项目，为专业的理发店制作一个在线
购物系统。但是我在巫婆语言方面存在一个很小的问题来制作这个系统。
脚本语言的选择不是在真空中完成的;它具有逻辑上与操作系统，HTTP服务器，
和数据库引擎的选择相关联的
。而这些选择反过来又受到性能要求和成本考虑因素的影响。
因为您没有告诉我们任何有关性能要求的信息
和成本方面的考虑，你不可能给你一个合理的
建议。
我的选择是PHP，但我听到许多人认为asp.net是<更好更稳定。
即使这是真的（并且意见各不相同），如果您的部署平台是Linux或FreeBSD，它与您有什么关系？b $ b？
所以我问你对asp.net和PHP的体验是什么。
两者（以及JSP，Perl或Python）可用于开发和部署高性能Web应用程序。当您使用昂贵但强大的仅限Microsoft的软件堆栈进行部署时，ASP是最好的。
（Win2K / IIS / SQL2K）;如果您愿意为大幅削减预算而支付小额b / b
的性能损失，那么PHP会发光，因此决定在开源软件堆栈上部署
。
欢呼，
NC
Nikolai Chuvakhin写道：
ASP最好的部署在昂贵但强大的Microsoft-only软件堆栈（Win2K / IIS / SQL2K）上;
我还没有经常看到健壮字样的字眼。与任何MS
产品一起使用。所以我不得不问这里具体的鲁棒性
是什么意思？
是否意味着这个链上的所有这些层，W2k，IIS ，SQL2k
和ASP明显比更便宜，主要是开源
来源同行更强大？
我原以为至少Apache应该是在谈论稳健性和安全性时，IIS是一个严肃的挑战者
。
当你愿意支付少量的性能损失时，PHP会大幅削减预算，以及因此决定部署在一个开源软件堆栈上。
有没有可用的基准测试，人们可以轻松看到
$ b这两个选项之间的速度差异是$ b，也许还有一些可供选择。
我自己不是* PHP爱好者。我只是想为近期自己的选择找到一些
可靠的事实。
Markku Nevalainen
Hello all,
I''m in a bit of a problem I''m given a project making an online
shopping system for a professional barbershop. But I''m with a small
problem in witch language to make the system.
My choice would be PHP but I hear from many people that asp.net is
better and more stable.
So I ask you what your experience with asp.net and PHP is.
Thank you already,
Warnar
I noticed that Message-ID: <01********************************@4ax.com>
from warstar contained the following:
I''m in a bit of a problem I''m given a project making an online
shopping system for a professional barbershop.
I think PHP is definitely a cut above the rest - use it and you will
shave hours off your development time. You could run a pole but a few
people might get stroppy. Be sure to trim your code right down then it
won''t take long to comb through to find your mistakes. Pretty soon it
will be tight as a DA.
--
Geoff Berrow (put thecat out to email)
It''s only Usenet, no one dies.
My opinions, not the committee''s, mine.
Simple RFDs http://www.ckdog.co.uk/rfdmaker/
warstar <wa*****@NSA.ml> wrote in message
news:<01********************************@4ax.com>. ..
I''m in a bit of a problem I''m given a project making an online
shopping system for a professional barbershop. But I''m with a small
problem in witch language to make the system.
The choice of scripting language is not done in a vacuum; it has
to be logically tied to the choice of operating system, HTTP server,
and database engine. And those choices, in turn, are heavily
influenced by performance requirements and cost considerations.
Since you are not telling us anything about performance requirements
and cost considerations, it''s impossible to give you a rational
advice.
My choice would be PHP but I hear from many people that asp.net is
better and more stable.
Even if this is true (and opinions vary), how is it relevant to you
if your deployment platform is, say, Linux or FreeBSD?
So I ask you what your experience with asp.net and PHP is.
Both (as well as JSP, Perl, or Python) can be used to develop and
deploy high-performance Web applications. ASP is best when you
deploy on costly, but robust Microsoft-only software stack
(Win2K/IIS/SQL2K); PHP shines when you are willing to pay a small
performance penalty for significant budget cuts and thus decide
to deploy on an open-source software stack.
Cheers,
NC
Nikolai Chuvakhin wrote:
ASP is best when you deploy on costly, but robust Microsoft-only
software stack (Win2K/IIS/SQL2K);
I have not very often seen word "robust" used with any of the MS
products. So I''ll have to ask what does the robustness specifically
mean here?
Does it mean that all these layers on this chain, W2k, IIS, SQL2k
and ASP are significantly more robust than the cheaper, mainly open
source counterparts?
I have thought that at least Apache should be a serious challenger
for IIS, when talking about robustness and security.
PHP shines when you are willing to pay a small performance penalty
for significant budget cuts and thus decide to deploy on an
open-source software stack.
Is there some benchmarks available, where one could easiy see the
speed difference between these two choices, and maybe still some
otheralternatives.
I am *not* a PHP enthusiast myself. I''m just trying to find some
reliable facts for my near future own choices.
Markku Nevalainen
这篇关于巫语选择？ （PHP或asp.net）的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
