这个会变得适度吗？ [英] should this ng become moderated?
问题描述
我不熟悉ng如何被调节，但这似乎是ms-access帮助的事实上的地方，它充满了噪音，这会减少
$ b来自任务的$ b。它似乎应该成为这个社区
的一个主持网站。
有什么意见吗？
-
******************************
Fred Parker
Lynn Consulting Group，LLC
http：// www .lynnconsultinggroup.com
******************************
I am not familiar with how an ng becomes moderated but this seems to be the
de-facto place for ms-access help and it is filled with noise which detracts
from the mission. It would seem it should become a moderated site for the
sake of the community here.
Any comments?
--
******************************
Fred Parker
Lynn Consulting Group, L.L.C.
http://www.lynnconsultinggroup.com
******************************
推荐答案
2004年2月11日星期三07:55:10 GMT in comp.databases.ms-access，" fp"
<等**************** @ hotmail.com>写道：
On Wed, 11 Feb 2004 07:55:10 GMT in comp.databases.ms-access, "fp"
<et****************@hotmail.com> wrote:
我不熟悉ng如何得到审核但这似乎是ms-access帮助的事实上的地方，它充满了噪音从任务中减去了
。它似乎应该成为这里社区的一个主持网站。
任何评论？
I am not familiar with how an ng becomes moderated but this seems to be the
de-facto place for ms-access help and it is filled with noise which detracts
from the mission. It would seem it should become a moderated site for the
sake of the community here.
Any comments?
哪里做你画线了吗？来自anon remailers的破坏性帖子？所有
OT帖子（例如这个< g>）？如果有人发布了一个蹩脚的回答并且只有一个后续跟踪发现它并且说那个是废话，那么你是否将这个帖子收入？或者让某人有机会问为什么？
-
A）bort，R）etry，I）用大锤子来影响。
Where do you draw the line? Disruptive posts from anon remailers? All
OT posts (such as this one <g>)? If someone posted a crappy answer and
only one followup spotted it and said "that''s crap", do you bin the
post? Or give someone the oppotunity to ask "why?"
--
A)bort, R)etry, I)nfluence with large hammer.
" Trevor Best" <摇椅@本地>在消息中写道
news：0b ******************************** @ 4ax.com ...
"Trevor Best" <bouncer@localhost> wrote in message
news:0b********************************@4ax.com...
2004年2月11日星期三07:55:10 GMT在comp.databases.ms-access中，fp
< et ******* *********@hotmail.com>写道：
On Wed, 11 Feb 2004 07:55:10 GMT in comp.databases.ms-access, "fp"
<et****************@hotmail.com> wrote:
我不熟悉ng如何得到审核但这似乎是
ms-access帮助的事实上的地方，它充满了噪音，
减损了任务。它似乎应该成为这里社区的温和网站。
任何评论？
I am not familiar with how an ng becomes moderated but this seems to be thede-facto place for ms-access help and it is filled with noise which detractsfrom the mission. It would seem it should become a moderated site for the
sake of the community here.
Any comments?
你在哪里画线？来自anon remailers的破坏性帖子？所有OT帖子（例如这个< g>）？如果有人发布了一个糟糕的答案，并且只有一个后续人员发现了它，并且说那是'废话，你是否将这个帖子收起来了？或者让某人有机会问为什么？
Where do you draw the line? Disruptive posts from anon remailers? All
OT posts (such as this one <g>)? If someone posted a crappy answer and
only one followup spotted it and said "that''s crap", do you bin the
post? Or give someone the oppotunity to ask "why?"
这是废话！
That''s crap!
Trevor Best写道：
Trevor Best wrote:
你在哪里划线？来自anon remailers的破坏性帖子？所有OT帖子（例如这个< g>）？如果有人发布了一个糟糕的答案，并且只有一个后续人员发现了它，并且说那是'废话，你是否将这个帖子收起来了？或者让某人有机会问为什么？
Where do you draw the line? Disruptive posts from anon remailers? All
OT posts (such as this one <g>)? If someone posted a crappy answer and
only one followup spotted it and said "that''s crap", do you bin the
post? Or give someone the oppotunity to ask "why?"
我的想法：
攻击性/辱骂性/冒犯性的语言和人身攻击将被禁止。我愿意详细说明。
OT帖子不应该。
蹩脚的答案不应该。每个人都有权通过提供
答案来学习，这看起来很愚蠢。
-
Bas Cost Budde
http://www.heuveltop.org/BasCB
，但域名为nl
My ideas:
Agressive/abusive/offending language and personal attacks are to be
banned. I''m willing to elaborate on that.
OT posts should not.
Crappy answers should not. Everybody has the right to learn by providing
answers, stupid as they may seem.
--
Bas Cost Budde
http://www.heuveltop.org/BasCB
but the domain is nl
这篇关于这个会变得适度吗？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
