Re：xhtml 1.0，xhtml 1.1，html 4.01或html 5.X？ - 梅肯 [英] Re: xhtml 1.0, xhtml 1.1, html 4.01, or html 5.X? -Guy Macon
问题描述
7月19日9：00 * pm，Guy Macon< http：//www.GuyMacon.com/wrote：
在comp.infosystems中。 www.authoring.html ，Denis McMahon写道：
因此，选择是成熟且广泛支持的html 4.01，
a踩脚石（xhtml 1.0），或者不完全支持的xhtml 1.1。
我倾向于选择严格的HTML 4.01，任何人都可以说服我
>这是目前错误的决定？
在你提出的三个选择中，我会说
html 4.01 strict是最好的选择
HTML 4.01严格是目前最好和最值得推荐的选择。
2 HTML 4.01严格和HTML 5之间的主要区别是
- HTML 5将推动结构和演示之间的分离
。因此，那些已经在他们的HTML 4.01严格的
网页中执行该操作的人将在以后的几年中做更少的工作，这将是
升级到HTML 5.另一个令人信服的理由是从结构（内容）中进一步分离
演示文稿（样式）是互联网
资源管理器8将最终修复很多CSS 2.1错误。
- HTML 5将添加更多语义元素的新元素。 < nl>
（导航列表），< section，< footerfor页脚，< header>，
等...这将增加更多含义结构元素
当前网页。那些已经使用< div> s
进行此类分页的人不会在HTML 5最终成为官方时感到迷失。
HTML 5将在许多方面成为一个更合乎逻辑，更连贯的扩展，延续HTML 4而不是XHTML 1.x.
问候，Gérard
-
Internet Explorer 7中的156个错误
http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/MSIE7Bugs/
Internet Explorer 8 beta 1中的130个错误
http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/MSIE8Bugs/
GTalbot写道：
2 HTML 4.01严格和HTML 5之间的主要区别在于 - HTML 5
将推动结构与presenta之间的分离此外。
关于删除表示HTML的唯一重大变化是表格特定表示属性中的一些（例如''align'） '，
''valign''）。 4.01 Strict中的大多数其他表示HTML（例如
< b>，< i>，< sup>，< sub>，@ style）仍然存在于HTML 5中。
更大的变化是将很多语义从类转移到
元素标记名称。例如< div class =" section" become< section>
-
Toby A Inkster BSc（荣誉）ARCS
[Geek of HTML / SQL / Perl / PHP / Python / Apache / Linux]
[操作系统：Linux 2.6.24.4-1mnbcustom-g5n1，上升28天，18：20。]
[正在播放：Everclear - Brown Eyed Girl [Van Morrison]]
用RDFa扩展hCard
http://tobyinkster.co.uk/blog/2008/07/16/hcard-rdfa /
在文章< pa ********************* @ tobyinkster.co .uk> ;, Toby A Inkster< us ********** @ tobyinkster.co.ukwrites：
> GTalbot写道：
> HTML 4.01严格和HTML 5之间的主要区别在于 - HTML 5
将推动此外，结构和表示之间的分离。
4.01严格的大部分其他表现性HTML（例如
< b>，< i>，< ; sup>，< sub>，@ style）仍然存在于HTML 5中。
我害怕我看不到上标和下标仅仅是
表现（虽然我确实承认表现方面）。
我已经写了很多关于各种数学主题的页面，并且可以告诉
你，a-sub-2和a-sub-2之间存在很大的差异。和平方。
a-sub-2-cubed之间的差异甚至更大。和a-sub-3-squared。
显示这些差异的事实，并且已经显示了几个不同的b $ b世纪，数字的标记并没有改变这样的事实：
它们绝对代表不同的内容。
-
Michael F. Stemper
#include< Standard_Disclaimer>
可视化旋转的豌豆！
Michael Stemper schreef：
< blockquote class =post_quotes>
在文章< pa ********************* @ tobyinkster.co.uk> ;, Toby A Inkster< us**********@tobyinkster.co.ukwrites：
> GTalbot写道：
>> HTML 4.01严格和HTML 5之间的主要区别在于 - HTML 5
将进一步推动结构和表示之间的分离。
> 4.01 Strict中的大多数其他表示HTML（例如
< b>，< i>，< sup>，< sub>，@ style）仍然存在于HTML 5中。
我担心我看不到上标和下标只是
表现（虽然我确实承认了表达方面）。 />
我已经写了很多关于各种数学主题的页面，并且可以告诉你，你知道a-sub-之间有很大的不同2英寸和平方。
a-sub-2-cubed之间的差异甚至更大。和a-sub-3-squared。
显示这些差异的事实，并且已经显示了几个不同的b $ b世纪，数字的标记并没有改变它们肯定代表不同内容的事实。
但isna ?? t mathml应该取代所有这些？
H.
-
Hendrik Maryns
http://tcl.sfs.uni-tuebingen.de/~hendrik/
================== http://aouw.org
提出聪明的问题，变得更好答案：
http：//www.catb .org / ~esr / faqs / smart-questions.html
On Jul 19, 9:00*pm, Guy Macon <http://www.GuyMacon.com/wrote:
In comp.infosystems.www.authoring.html, Denis McMahon wrote:
So, the choice is the mature and widely supported html 4.01,
a stepping stone (xhtml 1.0), or the not fully supported xhtml 1.1.
I''m inclined to go for html 4.01 strict, can anyone convince me
that >this is the wrong decision at the moment?
Of the three choices you have presented, I would say that
html 4.01 strict is the best choice
HTML 4.01 strict is the best and most recommendable choice for now.
2 main differences between HTML 4.01 strict and HTML 5 is that
- HTML 5 will push the separation between structure and presentation
furthermore. So those who do that already in their HTML 4.01 strict
webpages will have less work to do later in the years to come when
upgrading to HTML 5. Another compelling reason to separate further
presentation (style) from structure (content) is that Internet
Explorer 8 will finally fix a lot of the CSS 2.1 bugs.
- HTML 5 will add new elements which are more semantic elements. <nl>
(navigation lists), <section, <footerfor page footer, <header>,
etc.. which will add more meaning to the structuring elements of
current webpages. Those who already do such page divisions with <div>s
will not feel lost in any way when HTML 5 finally become official.
HTML 5 will in many ways become a more logical, more coherent
extension, continuation of HTML 4 than XHTML 1.x.
Regards, Gérard
--
156 bugs in Internet Explorer 7
http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/MSIE7Bugs/
130 bugs in Internet Explorer 8 beta 1
http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/MSIE8Bugs/
GTalbot wrote:
2 main differences between HTML 4.01 strict and HTML 5 is that - HTML 5
will push the separation between structure and presentation furthermore.The only major change with regards to dropping presentational HTML are a
few of the table-specific presentation attributes (e.g. ''align'',
''valign''). Most of the other presentational HTML from 4.01 Strict (e.g.
<b>, <i>, <sup>, <sub>, @style) is still present in HTML 5.
The bigger change is the move of a lot of semantics from classes to the
element tag names. e.g. <div class="section"becoming <section>
--
Toby A Inkster BSc (Hons) ARCS
[Geek of HTML/SQL/Perl/PHP/Python/Apache/Linux]
[OS: Linux 2.6.24.4-1mnbcustom-g5n1, up 28 days, 18:20.]
[Now Playing: Everclear - Brown Eyed Girl [Van Morrison]]
Extending hCard with RDFa
http://tobyinkster.co.uk/blog/2008/07/16/hcard-rdfa/
In article <pa*********************@tobyinkster.co.uk>, Toby A Inkster <us**********@tobyinkster.co.ukwrites:>GTalbot wrote:
>2 main differences between HTML 4.01 strict and HTML 5 is that - HTML 5
will push the separation between structure and presentation furthermore.
Most of the other presentational HTML from 4.01 Strict (e.g.
<b>, <i>, <sup>, <sub>, @style) is still present in HTML 5.I''m afraid that I don''t see superscripts and subscripts as merely
presentational (although I do certainly admit a presentational aspect).
I''ve written a lot of pages on various mathematical topics, and can tell
you that there''s a big difference between "a-sub-2" and "a-squared". An
even bigger difference between "a-sub-2-cubed" and "a-sub-3-squared".
The fact that these differences are shown, and have been shown for several
centuries, by differing placment of numerals does not change the fact that
they very definitely represent differing content.
--
Michael F. Stemper
#include <Standard_Disclaimer>
Visualize whirled peas!
Michael Stemper schreef:In article <pa*********************@tobyinkster.co.uk>, Toby A Inkster <us**********@tobyinkster.co.ukwrites:>GTalbot wrote:
>>2 main differences between HTML 4.01 strict and HTML 5 is that - HTML 5
will push the separation between structure and presentation furthermore.
> Most of the other presentational HTML from 4.01 Strict (e.g.
<b>, <i>, <sup>, <sub>, @style) is still present in HTML 5.
I''m afraid that I don''t see superscripts and subscripts as merely
presentational (although I do certainly admit a presentational aspect).
I''ve written a lot of pages on various mathematical topics, and can tell
you that there''s a big difference between "a-sub-2" and "a-squared". An
even bigger difference between "a-sub-2-cubed" and "a-sub-3-squared".
The fact that these differences are shown, and have been shown for several
centuries, by differing placment of numerals does not change the fact that
they very definitely represent differing content.But isna??t mathml supposed to replace all that?
H.
--
Hendrik Maryns
http://tcl.sfs.uni-tuebingen.de/~hendrik/
==================
http://aouw.org
Ask smart questions, get good answers:
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
这篇关于Re：xhtml 1.0，xhtml 1.1，html 4.01或html 5.X？ - 梅肯的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
