INCITS / ISO / IEC 14882：2003 vs INCITS / ISO / IEC 14882：1998 [英] INCITS/ISO/IEC 14882:2003 vs INCITS/ISO/IEC 14882:1998

问题描述

各位大家好！

我在几个网站上寻找ISO C ++标准的PDf版本，我发现

几个文件。一个在这里： http://www.techstreet.com/cgi -bin / de ... oduct_id = 49964

，它被命名为INCITS-Adopted ISO / IEC Standard并且它告诉我，这个

版本的标准被2003年的另一个评论所取代。


我有我多年前从同一网站购买的副本它说

ISO / IEC 14882-1998（E）。 2003年的版本不同，实际上是1998年版本的786页而不是732页。


现在有人在ISO C ++中有什么新东西吗？自1998年以来？只是好奇，如果它值得再见2003年版本以找出这54页中的新内容？


只是想知道hash_map<>终于达到了标准？


干杯，

---

阿列克谢·波尔哈诺夫

Sr 。顾问/软件系统分析师

电话：[phone]

电子邮件： us **** @ monteaureus.com
http：// www.monteaureus.com/

解决方案

Alexei Polkhanov写道：...

http：/ /www.acceleratedcpp.com/author.../revisions.pdf


问候，

alexander。

2004年4月24日星期六23:22:37 +0200，Alexander Terekhov

< te ****** @ web.de>写道：

http://www.acceleratedcpp.com/author.../revisions.pdf

有没有人知道同等文件突出显示改变了

的话，或者更容易阅读？

" Alexei Polkhanov" <我们**** @ monteaureus.com>在消息中写道

新闻：呃******************** @ novus-tele.net ...

各位大家好！
我在几个网站上都在寻找ISO C ++标准的PDf版本，我发现很少有文件。一个在这里：
http：//www.techstreet .com / cgi-bin / de ... oduct_id = 49964 ，它被命名为INCITS-Adopted ISO / IEC Standard。它告诉我
这个版本的标准被2003年的另一个评论所取代。

我有我多年前从同一网站购买的副本，它说的是
ISO / IEC 14882-1998（E）。 2003年的版本是不同的，事实上它是1998年版本的786页而不是732页。

现在有人在1998年以来的ISO C ++中有什么新东西吗？只是古玩，如果它是
值得再见2003版本找出这54页中的新内容？

只是想知道hash_map<>最终成为标准？

2003是一个错误修复。它没有什么新东西，只清除了某些实施

问题。该标准即将进行的主要修订仍在考虑中，并且可以简单地称为C ++ 0x。在社区。


Ioannis Vranos

Hello everybody!
I was looking for PDf version of ISO C++ standard on several websites and I found
few documents. one here: http://www.techstreet.com/cgi-bin/de...oduct_id=49964
and it is named "INCITS-Adopted ISO/IEC Standard" and it tells me that this
version of standard was replaced by another review from year 2003.

I have my copy I purchased from same website many years ago and it says
ISO/IEC 14882-1998(E). Version from 2003 is different, in fact it is
786 pages instead of 732 pages for 1998 year version.

Does anyone now what is new in ISO C++ since 1998 ? Just curios if it is worth
to bye yr 2003 version to find out what new in those 54 pages ?

Just wondering if hash_map<> finally made it to standard ?

Cheers,
---
Alexei Polkhanov
Sr. Consultant/Software Systems Analyst
Tel: [phone]
E-mail: us****@monteaureus.com
http://www.monteaureus.com/

解决方案

Alexei Polkhanov wrote: ...

http://www.acceleratedcpp.com/author.../revisions.pdf

regards,
alexander.

On Sat, 24 Apr 2004 23:22:37 +0200, Alexander Terekhov
<te******@web.de> wrote:

http://www.acceleratedcpp.com/author.../revisions.pdf

does anyone know of an equivalent document HIGHLIGHTING the changed
words, or anyhow easier to read?

"Alexei Polkhanov" <us****@monteaureus.com> wrote in message
news:Er********************@novus-tele.net...

Hello everybody!
I was looking for PDf version of ISO C++ standard on several websites and I found few documents. one here: http://www.techstreet.com/cgi-bin/de...oduct_id=49964 and it is named "INCITS-Adopted ISO/IEC Standard" and it tells me that this version of standard was replaced by another review from year 2003.

I have my copy I purchased from same website many years ago and it says
ISO/IEC 14882-1998(E). Version from 2003 is different, in fact it is
786 pages instead of 732 pages for 1998 year version.

Does anyone now what is new in ISO C++ since 1998 ? Just curios if it is worth to bye yr 2003 version to find out what new in those 54 pages ?

Just wondering if hash_map<> finally made it to standard ?

2003 is a "bug fix". It has nothing new, only cleared certain implementation
issues. The upcoming major revision of the standard is still under
consideration and is cutely called "C++0x" in the community.


Ioannis Vranos

这篇关于INCITS / ISO / IEC 14882：2003 vs INCITS / ISO / IEC 14882：1998的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！