有多少人禁用了Javascript？ [英] How many people disable Javascript?

问题描述

我想知道是否有一个已知统计数据显示有多少人从他们的客户端禁用javascript支持，如果他们这样做了它有意或默认为
，当它是故意的时候背后的原因是什么？


例如，我已经禁用Flash支持，我意识到很多

网站甚至都不会检查我是否支持它只会

给我一个空白页面，他们没有看到关心/了解它。


谢谢，


Matty。

Hi,

I was wondering if there is a known statistic on how many people
disable javascript support from their client, and if they do is it
intentional or by some default, and when it is intentional what is the
reason behind it?

For example, I have disabled Flash support and I realize that a lot of
sites will just not even check if I support it or not and will just
show me a blank page, and they don''t see to care/know about it.

Thanks,

Matty.

推荐答案

matty写道：

matty wrote:

我想知道是否有一个已知统计数据有多少人
禁用javascript来自他们客户的支持，


否。在这方面自称为统计数据的任何事情都是有缺陷的。

见先前有关此事的讨论。

如果他们这样做是故意


它是。

或某些默认值，


它是。管理员可能已经在他们负责的所有机器上禁用了客户端脚本，以便减轻他们的工作。

当它是故意的时候，它背后的原因是什么？


滥用语言和DOM / AOM的脚本小子和破解者。

例如，我已禁用Flash支持，我意识到很多

I was wondering if there is a known statistic on how many people
disable javascript support from their client,
No. Anything that calls itself a statistic in that regard is flawed.
See previous discussions on the matter.
and if they do is it intentional
It is.
or by some default,
It is. Administrators may have disabled client-side script on
all machines they are in charge of in order to ease their work.
and when it is intentional what is the reason behind it?
Script-kiddies and crackers that abuse language and DOM/AOM.
For example, I have disabled Flash support and I realize that a lot of
sites will just not even check if I support it or not and will just
show me a blank page, and they don''t see to care/know about it.

是的，遗憾的是他们这样做了。那里有很多不称职的人。

PointedEars

Yes, sadly they do. There are a lot of incompetent people out there.
PointedEars

我'我不确定是否有任何可靠的统计数据。有人可能会故意禁用

javascript（例如，对弹出窗口，安全问题，

感到烦恼，或者可能使用他们不信任的新网站禁用它）。它有一些

的情况，系统管理员可能会为所有用户/员工禁用它。

我想你的网站可以从网络爬虫或其他人那里获得访问

机器流程。


我认为在您的网站中提供一些html导航是明智的，尝试

使内容可访问，并接受用户体验

该网站可能会减少。也许告诉他们你的网站是最好的

在启用javascript的浏览器中有经验。

Hi,

I''m not sure there is any reliable statistic. Someone may disable
javascript intentionally (e.g. annoyed with pop-ups, security concerns,
or perhaps disable it with new sites they don''t trust yet). It some
cases, a system administrator may disable it for all users/employees.
And I suppose your site could get visits from web crawler or other
machine process.

I think its wise to provide some html navigation in your site, try to
make the content accessible, and accept that the users experience on
the site may be diminished. Perhaps inform them that your site is best
experienced in a javascript enabled browser.

matty写道：

我想知道是否有一个已知的统计数据如何
许多人禁用他们的客户端的javascript支持，


是的，很多（其中一些来自某些人有点（通常是

未指定）的统计过程，而不仅仅是在

点上编制）。问题不在于是否有数字而是

这些数字是准确的，有代表性的，适用的，有用的和/或

有意义。没有证据表明他们中的任何一个是;只是

这是一个微不足道的结论，它不仅仅是所有的（对于

，你真的不需要统计数据）。

，如果他们这样做是故意或默认，


故意，偶然，默认情况下。

当故意是什么时候它背后的原因？


任何来自''因为我可以'来自微软的

之类的安全建议。

例如，我已禁用Flash支持，我意识到很多网站甚至都不会检查我是否支持
它只会向我显示一个空白页面，


我没有在IE中禁用javascript，而是禁用了ActiveX（在此过程中需要使用

的Flash），这导致了相当多的空白网页

网站本身（并且越来越多的人在得出错误的结论，即落后的AJAX适用于公共网站）。

ActiveX它是大多数IE漏洞实际依赖的东西，

javascript没有它是相当安全的。


想想所有其他可能在javascript上打开或关闭的东西

仍然可用，故意，意外或默认情况下。弹出窗口

windows，cookies（会话和一般情况下，或与b / b
相同的脚本化交互），元刷新，写入剪贴板，Java等等。所有可能影响结果的浏览器设置排列的b
$ b脚本活动。外部软件;代理（本地和远程），

防火墙，添加阻止程序等。


浏览器脚本的世界并不像黑白一样<是否可以使用脚本编写问题。

并且他们看不到关心/了解它。

I was wondering if there is a known statistic on how
many people disable javascript support from their client,
Yes, lots (and some of them derived from some sort of (usually
unspecified) statistical process instead of just being made up on the
spot). The question is not whether there are numbers but rather are
those numbers accurate, representative, applicable, useful and/or
meaningful. There is no evidence to suggest that nay of them are; just
the trivial conclusion that it is more than none and less than all (for
which you don''t really need a statistic).
and if they do is it intentional or by some default,
Intentionally, by accident and by default.
and when it is intentional what is the reason behind it?
Anything from ''because I can'' to following security advice from the
likes of Microsoft.
For example, I have disabled Flash support and I realize
that a lot of sites will just not even check if I support
it or not and will just show me a blank page,
Rather than disabling javascript in IE I disable ActiveX (which takes
out Flash in the process), that results in a fair number of blank web
sites in itself (and increasingly when people draw the erroneous
conclusion that fall-backless AJAX is appropriate for public web-sites).
ActiveX it the thing that most IE vulnerabilities actually rely upon,
javascript without it is fairly safe.

Think of all the other things that may be on or off while javascript is
still available, deliberately, accidentally or by default. Pop-up
windows, cookies (session and in general, or scripted interactions with
the same), meta-refresh, writing to the clipboard, Java, and so on. All
of the permutations of browser settings that may influence the outcome
of scripted activity. The external software; proxies (local and remote),
firewalls, add-blockers, etc.

The world of browser scripting is not nearly as black and white as just
a matter of scripting being available or not.
and they don''t see to care/know about it.

什么，既不懂也不关心的网站开发人员/设计师？这个想法！

;-)

理查德。

What, web developers/designers who neither know nor care? The very idea!
;-)

Richard.

这篇关于有多少人禁用了Javascript？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！