具有子类参数的C#覆盖方法 [英] C# Override method with subclass parameter
问题描述
我正在努力实现这样的目标
I'm trying to achieve something like this
public abstract class BaseEvent
{
public abstract void Dispatch(IEventHandler handler);
}
public class MyEvent : BaseEvent
{
public override void Dispatch(IMyEventHandler handler)
{
handler.OnMyEvent(this);
}
}
public interface IEventHandler
{
}
public interface IMyEventHandler : IEventHandler
{
void OnMyEvent(MyEvent e);
}
问题是编译器抱怨说MyEvent
没有实现BaseEvent
,因为Dispatch
使用的是IMyEventHandler
而不是IEventHandler
.我不想让MyEvent.Dispatch
接受IEventHandler
然后将其强制转换为IMyEventHandler
,因为我想编译时间检查以确保我没有做像传递其他类型的事件处理程序那样的愚蠢行为.我找到了一个可能的解决方案(如下),但我想知道是否有更好的方法可以做到这一点.
The problem is that the compiler complains saying that MyEvent
doesn't implement BaseEvent
since Dispatch
is taking an IMyEventHandler
instead of an IEventHandler
. I don't want to let MyEvent.Dispatch
take a IEventHandler
then cast it to a IMyEventHandler
because I would like compile time checks to make sure I'm not doing something stupid like passing in some other type of event handler. I found a possible solution (below) but I'm wondering if there is a nicer way of doing this.
public abstract class BaseEvent<H> where H : IEventHandler
{
public abstract void Dispatch(H handler);
}
public class MyFirstEvent<H> : BaseEvent<H> where H : IMyFirstEventHandler
{
public override void Dispatch(H handler)
{
handler.OnMyFirstEvent(this);
}
}
public interface IEventHandler
{
}
public interface IMyFirstEventHandler : IEventHandler
{
void OnMyFirstEvent<H>(MyFirstEvent<H> e) where H : IMyFirstEventHandler;
}
谢谢汤姆
推荐答案
我以前使用过您的方法.
I've used your approach before.
对我来说看起来很扎实.
It looks pretty solid to me.
这篇关于具有子类参数的C#覆盖方法的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!