括号初始化中的等号是否有所不同?例如. 'T a = {}'与'T a {}' [英] Does the equal sign make a difference in brace initialization? eg. 'T a = {}' vs 'T a{}'
问题描述
以下是在C ++ 11中初始化变量的两种方法:
Here are two ways to initialize a variable in C++11:
T a {something};
T a = {something};
我在所有可以想到的场景中测试了这两个场景,但我没有注意到有什么不同. 此答案表明两者之间存在细微差别:
I tested these two in all scenarios I could think of and I failed to notice a difference. This answer suggests that there is a subtle difference between the two:
对于变量,在
T t = { init };
或T t { init };
样式之间我不太关注,我发现两者之间的差别很小,并且最坏的情况是只会导致有用的编译器消息,涉及滥用显式构造函数.
For variables I don't pay much attention between the
T t = { init };
orT t { init };
styles, I find the difference to be minor and will at worst only result in a helpful compiler message about misusing an explicit constructor.
那么,两者之间有什么区别吗?
So, is there any difference between the two?
推荐答案
我知道的唯一重要区别是对explicit
构造函数的处理:
The only significant difference I know is in the treatment of explicit
constructors:
struct foo
{
explicit foo(int);
};
foo f0 {42}; // OK
foo f1 = {42}; // not allowed
这类似于传统"初始化:
This is similar to the "traditional" initialization:
foo f0 (42); // OK
foo f1 = 42; // not allowed
请参阅[over.match.list]/1.
See [over.match.list]/1.
除此之外,还有一个缺陷(请参见 CWG 1270 )在C ++ 11中仅允许对T a = {something}
Apart from that, there's a defect (see CWG 1270) in C++11 that allows brace-elision only for the form T a = {something}
struct aggr
{
int arr[5];
};
aggr a0 = {1,2,3,4,5}; // OK
aggr a1 {1,2,3,4,5}; // not allowed
这篇关于括号初始化中的等号是否有所不同?例如. 'T a = {}'与'T a {}'的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!