公开的UDDI运动死了还是活着? [英] Is the public UDDI movement dead or, was it ever alive?

问题描述

出于学习目的，我试图找到一些公共UDDI注册中心进行交互.但似乎没有可用的.我在SO上弹出以下问题以查看是否有人知道任何问题公共注册表仍托管，但没有答案.

I am trying to find some public UDDI registries to interact with, for learning purposes. But it seems there are none available. I popped the following question on SO to see if someone knows about any public registry still hosted, but got no answers.

IBM，Microsoft和SAP公共注册表对UDDI技术进行了测试.我从此处引用: UBR的主要目标是证明通过公共实施实现UDDI规范的互操作性和鲁棒性.这个目标已经实现，远远超出了目标.

The IBM, Microsoft and SAP public registries were a test of the UDDI technology. I quote from here: The primary goal of the UBR was to prove the interoperability and robustness of the UDDI specifications through a public implementation. This goal was met and far exceeded.

他们现在继续在其产品中支持UDDI规范(因此，不同的公司可以托管其UBR供私人使用).

They now continue to support the UDDI specifications in their products (so, different companies can host their UBRs for private use).

现在，我将原来的问题更改为:公开的UDDI运动死了还是活着?

Now, I am changing my original question to this: Is the public UDDI movement dead or, was it ever alive?

您怎么看?如果您的回答是否定的，您可以提供一个现有的公共UDDI UBR的示例吗?

What do you think? If your answer is no, can you provide an example of an existing public UDDI UBR?

推荐答案

我收到了 John Saunders 的答复在我的原始问题上，对我的评论之一 ，我认为他是对的.

I received an answer from John Saunders on my original question, to one of my comments, and I think he is right.

总结一下:

公共UDDI运动已死，因为IBM，Microsoft和SAP公共注册表是UDDI运动.

The public UDDI movement is dead because the IBM, Microsoft and SAP public registries were the UDDI movement.

这篇关于公开的UDDI运动死了还是活着?的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！