是"refs/heads/master"吗?与"refs/remotes/origin/master"相同.在Git中? [英] Is "refs/heads/master" same as "refs/remotes/origin/master" in Git?

问题描述

问题很简单:refs/heads/master与refs/remotes/origin/master是一样的东西吗?如果在某些情况下不是，那么我怎么知道什么时候不知道什么呢?

The question is simple: is refs/heads/master the same thing as refs/remotes/origin/master? If it is not in some cases, how can I know when it is not and what it is then?

推荐答案

它们是两个不同的符号名称，可以指向不同的事物. refs/heads/master是工作副本中名为master的分支.通常，这是refs/remotes/origin/master的跟踪分支，因为origin是git clone创建的远程服务器的默认名称，并且其主要分支通常也称为master.

They are two different symbolic names that can point to different things. refs/heads/master is a branch in your working copy named master. Frequently that is a tracking branch of refs/remotes/origin/master because origin is the default name for the remote created by git clone and its primary branch is usually also named master.

您可以使用git rev-list refs/heads/master..refs/remotes/origin/master看到它们之间的差异，如果它们相同，则为空，否则将列出它们之间的提交.

You can see the difference between them with git rev-list refs/heads/master..refs/remotes/origin/master which will be empty if they are the same and will otherwise list the commits between them.

这篇关于是"refs/heads/master"吗?与"refs/remotes/origin/master"相同.在Git中?的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！