是否需要更新版权日期? [英] Do copyright dates need to be updated?

问题描述

我时不时会看到一个版权日期很旧的网站.在我的脑海里，我一直在想看那个忘记更新版权年的傻瓜！"然后，当我将版权年份硬编码到我目前正在设计的网站中时，它突然让我震惊:

Every now and then I see a web site that has an old copyright date. In my mind, I always think "Look at the sucker who forgot to update his copyright year!" Then, while I was hard-coding a copyright year into the site I'm currently designing, it suddenly struck me:

我怎么会记得更新这个?

How the hell am I going to remember to update this?

我的直接反应就是使用一些服务器端编码来自动显示当前年份.砰，固定.

My immediate reaction was just to use some server-side coding to automatically display the current year. Bam, fixed.

后来，我开始思考自己，如果像谷歌这样大而聪明的人可以忽略这一点，也许有这样做是有问题的.也许我做错了什么?我想我真正想知道的是为什么我觉得有必要让版权年份保持最新.有什么原因吗，还是我的慢性强迫症有问题?

Later, I began to ponder to myself, if someone as big and smart as Google can overlook this, perhaps there's something wrong in doing it this way. Maybe I'm doing something wrong? I guess what I'm really wondering is why I feel compelled to keep the copyright year up to date. Is there a reason, or is my chronic OCD to blame?

如果有充分的理由让它们保持最新状态，为什么没有更多的开发人员使用服务器端代码?我看到这些错误"全部 超过 地方.

If there is a good reason to keep them up to date, why don't more developers use server-side code? I see these "mistakes" all over the place.

推荐答案

作品的版权声明确立了对版权的主张.通知上的日期确定了提出索赔的时间.这意味着如果您更新日期，您将不再主张原始日期的版权，这意味着如果有人在此期间复制了该作品，并且他们声称该作品属于他们的版权，理由是他们发布该副本是在您提出主张之前，那么很难确定谁是作品的原创者.

The copyright notice on a work establishes a claim to copyright. The date on the notice establishes how far back the claim is made. This means if you update the date, you are no longer claiming the copyright for the original date and that means if somebody has copied the work in the meantime and they claim its theirs on the ground that their publishing the copy was before your claim, then it will be difficult to establish who is the originator of the work.

因此，如果声明是基于普通法版权(未正式注册)，​​则日期应为首次发布日期.如果声明是注册版权，则日期应为注册中声明的日期.如果作品被大幅修订，您可以通过添加另一个具有更新日期的版权声明或通过在现有声明中添加附加日期(如© 2000, 2010")来对修订后的作品提出新的版权主张.同样，添加的日期确定了对修订版提出索赔的时间.

Therefore, if the claim is based on common law copyright (not formally registered), then the date should be the date of first publication. If the claim is a registered copyright, then the date should be the date claimed in the registration. In cases where the work was substantially revised you may establish a new copyright claim to the revised work by adding another copyright notice with a newer date or by adding an additional date to the existing notice as in "© 2000, 2010". Again, the added date establishes how far back the claim is made on the revision.

这篇关于是否需要更新版权日期?的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！