Android 测试:UIAutomator 与 Espresso [英] Android Testing: UIAutomator vs Espresso

查看:47
本文介绍了Android 测试:UIAutomator 与 Espresso的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

我正在寻找用于 Android UI 自动化的测试框架,但偶然发现了 UI AutomatorEspresso,这是我感到困惑的部分 -

I was seeking for test frameworks for Android UI automation and I stumbled upon UI Automator and Espresso and this is the part I am confused about -

  1. 两者均由 Google 维护
  2. 两者都用于功能 UI 测试
  3. 两者都是 Android 唯一的框架
  1. Both are maintained by Google
  2. Both are used for functional UI testing
  3. Both are Android only frameworks

所以我的问题/疑问是 -

So my questions/doubts here are -

  • UI AutomatorEspresso 的主要区别是什么?
  • 是否需要修改源代码以集成任何这些框架?
  • 一个框架比另一个有什么优势吗?如果是,那么哪个框架最适合 Android 应用程序的 UI 自动化?
  • What is the major difference between UI Automator and Espresso?
  • Will the source code have to be modified to integrate any of these frameworks?
  • Does one framework hold any advantage over the other? If yes, then which framework is the most suitable for UI automation of an Android app?

推荐答案

其实不需要选择.UIAutomator 和 Espresso 使用相同的检测运行器,因此您可以在单个测试中使用来自它们的命令.Espresso 在 UI 上具有各种匹配器、断言和操作,而自动化工具则没有:

Actually, you don't need to choose. UIAutomator and Espresso use the same instrumentation runner, so you can use commands from both of them in a single test. Espresso has variety of matchers, assertions and actions on UI, that automator doesn't have:

浓缩咖啡备忘单

Espresso 在单独的线程中运行,与其他测试框架相比,它的速度非常快.

Espresso is running in separate thread and it is really fast comparing to other test frameworks.

作为摘要:在您的测试中同时使用它们,Espresso 是主要的,而 UIAutomator 作为 OS 集成的附加工具.

as Summary: use both of them in your tests, Espresso is main and UIAutomator as an additional tool for OS integration.

这篇关于Android 测试:UIAutomator 与 Espresso的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆