为什么(无效)0在C和C ++无操作? [英] Why is (void) 0 a no operation in C and C++?

查看:213
本文介绍了为什么(无效)0在C和C ++无操作?的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

我见过的的glibc 的调试用printfs在内部被定义为(无效)0 ,如果 NDEBUG 的是定义。同样, __空操作 为Visual C ++编译器也在那儿。在GCC和VC ++编译器,前者的作品,而后者只能在VC ++。现在大家都知道,无论是上述声明将被视为无操作,也没有相应的code将产生;但这里的地方我有一个疑问。

I have seen debug printfs in glibc which internally is defined as (void) 0, if NDEBUG is defined. Likewise the __noop for Visual C++ compiler is there too. The former works on both GCC and VC++ compilers, while the latter only on VC++. Now we all know that both the above statements will be treated as no operation and no respective code will be generated; but here's where I've a doubt.

的情况下,__空操作,MSDN说,这是由编译器提供的内部函数。来到(无效)0 〜为什么间$ P $由编译器为无操作PTED?它是C语言的一个棘手的用法还是标准说的一些东西明确地?甚至可以说,是值得做的编译器实现?

In case of __noop, MSDN says that it's a intrinsic function provided by the compiler. Coming to (void) 0 ~ Why is it interpreted by the compilers as no op? Is it a tricky usage of the C language or does the standard say something about it explicity? Or even that is something to do with the compiler implementation?

推荐答案

(无效)0 (+ ; )是合法的,但不会无的C ++前pression,这就是一切。它不翻译成目标架构的无操作指令,它只是一个空的语句作为占位符每当语言需要一个完整的语句(例如目标为一跳转标签,或在如果条款的机构)。

(void)0 (+;) is a valid, but 'does-nothing' C++ expression, that's everything. It doesn't translate to the no-op instruction of the target architecture, it's just an empty statement as placeholder whenever the language expects a complete statement (for example as target for a jump label, or in the body of an if clause).

编辑:(根据克里斯·卢茨的评论更新)

(updated based on Chris Lutz's comment)

应当注意的是,作为宏使用时,说

It should be noted that when used as a macro, say

#define noop ((void)0)

(无效) $ P $被意外使用像

the (void) prevents it from being accidentally used as a value like

int x = noop;

有关上述前pression编译器会正确地将其标记为无效操作。 GCC吐​​奶错误:空值不被忽略,因为它应该是和VC ++树皮无效非法拥有各类

For the above expression the compiler will rightly flag it as an invalid operation. GCC spits error: void value not ignored as it ought to be and VC++ barks 'void' illegal with all types.

这篇关于为什么(无效)0在C和C ++无操作?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆