ReAlloc如果不调整指针数组 [英] Realloc is not resizing array of pointers
问题描述
我一直传递和返回dirs_later_array。当我到了new_size = ...中的其他块,我结束了2 new_size第二次左右。到现在为止还挺好。但是,当我做的realloc
dirs_later_array = realloc的(dirs_later_array,
new_size *的sizeof(结构dirs_later *));
的
sizeof的保持在图4中,指针的大小,为dirs_later_array。我能够在dirs_later_array [1],以成功地存储,但该值不断被覆盖掉,下一次我进入的功能。
结构dirs_later ** add_struct(为const char * findme,结构的dirent * DPTR,
结构统计* this_lstat,字符* RELATIVE_PATH,为const char * type_str,
结构dirs_later ** dirs_later_array){ 结构dirs_later * NEW_DIR =的malloc(sizeof的(结构dirs_later));
check_realloc_dirs_error(NEW_DIR); 如果(STRCMP(dptr-> d_name,。)){//目录,而不是同一个目录
//相对路径复制到结构
字符* relative_path2;
relative_path2 = malloc的(strlen的(RELATIVE_PATH)+1);
check_realloc_error(relative_path2);
的strcpy(relative_path2,RELATIVE_PATH); //如果(strlen的(RELATIVE_PATH)> 0)
// relative_path2 [strlen的(RELATIVE_PATH) - 1] ='\\ 0'; 如果(NULL!= NEW_DIR){
new_dir-> findme = findme;
new_dir-> DPTR = DPTR;
new_dir-> ST_MODE = this_lstat-> ST_MODE;
new_dir-> RELATIVE_PATH = relative_path2;
new_dir-> type_str = type_str;
}
INT new_size = 0;
/ *
//检查,如果这是在结构中的第一个元素
如果(sizeof的(dirs_later_array)/的sizeof(结构dirs_later *)== 1){
new_size = 1;
}
* /
如果(dirs_later_array == NULL){
dirs_later_array =的malloc(sizeof的(结构dirs_later *)); //存储目录结构或过程的后期
check_realloc_arr_error(* dirs_later_array);
new_size = 1;
}其他{ //将目录添加到目录阵列
new_size =(((的sizeof(dirs_later_array)+的sizeof(结构dirs_later *)))/的sizeof(结构dirs_later *));
//输出(新大小:%D,new_size);
}
dirs_later_array =的realloc(dirs_later_array,
new_size *的sizeof(结构dirs_later *));
check_realloc_arr_error(dirs_later_array);
dirs_later_array [new_size - 1] = NEW_DIR;
}
返回dirs_later_array;
}
运营商的sizeof
是一个编译时功能,它只检查一个前$ P $的静态大小pssion。因此,对于指针它只返回指针是4平台上的大小。 的sizeof
并不衡量一个动态分配的数据的大小。在C中没有标准的功能来获取动态分配数据的大小。
I keep passing in and returning the dirs_later_array. When I get to "new_size=..." in the else block, I end up with new_size of 2 the second time around. So far so good. But when I do a realloc
dirs_later_array = realloc(dirs_later_array,
new_size * sizeof(struct dirs_later*));
the sizeof remains at 4, the size of the pointer, for dirs_later_array. I'm able to succesfully store at dirs_later_array[1] but that value keeps getting overwritten the next time I go into the function.
struct dirs_later** add_struct(const char *findme, struct dirent *dptr, struct stat *this_lstat, char *relative_path, const char *type_str, struct dirs_later **dirs_later_array) { struct dirs_later *new_dir = malloc(sizeof(struct dirs_later)); check_realloc_dirs_error(new_dir); if (strcmp(dptr->d_name, ".")) { //Dir and not same directory //Copy the relative path to the struct char *relative_path2; relative_path2 = malloc(strlen(relative_path) + 1); check_realloc_error(relative_path2); strcpy(relative_path2, relative_path); //if (strlen(relative_path) > 0) // relative_path2[strlen(relative_path) - 1] = '\0'; if (NULL != new_dir) { new_dir->findme = findme; new_dir->dptr = dptr; new_dir->st_mode = this_lstat->st_mode; new_dir->relative_path = relative_path2; new_dir->type_str = type_str; } int new_size = 0; /* //Check if this is the first element in the struct if (sizeof(dirs_later_array) / sizeof(struct dirs_later*) == 1) { new_size = 1; } */ if (dirs_later_array == NULL) { dirs_later_array = malloc(sizeof(struct dirs_later*)); //Store the directory structures or process later check_realloc_arr_error(*dirs_later_array); new_size = 1; } else { //Add directories to directories array new_size = (((sizeof(dirs_later_array) + sizeof(struct dirs_later*)))/sizeof(struct dirs_later*)); //printf("new size: %d",new_size); } dirs_later_array = realloc(dirs_later_array, new_size * sizeof(struct dirs_later*)); check_realloc_arr_error(dirs_later_array); dirs_later_array[new_size - 1] = new_dir; } return dirs_later_array; }
Operator sizeof
is a compile time feature and it only checks the static size of an expression. So for pointer it only returns the size of that pointer which is 4 on your platform. sizeof
does not measure the size of a dynamically allocated data. There is no standard feature in C to get the size of dynamically allocated data.
这篇关于ReAlloc如果不调整指针数组的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!