C / C ++:跳转到for循环 [英] C/C++: goto into the for loop
问题描述
我有一点不寻常的情况 - 我想使用goto语句跳到到的循环,而不是从中跳出
I have a bit unusual situation - I want to use goto statement to jump into the loop, not to jump out from it.
有充分的理由这样做 - 这code必须是一些功能,这使得第一次呼叫经过一番计算,以请求新的数据返回,需要多一个电话,继续的一部分。函数指针(明显的解决方案)不能使用,因为我们需要code不支持函数指针的互操作性。
There are strong reasons to do so - this code must be part of some function which makes some calculations after the first call, returns with request for new data and needs one more call to continue. Function pointers (obvious solution) can't be used because we need interoperability with code which does not support function pointers.
我想知道是否低于code是安全的,也就是说,它会被正确地被所有符合标准的C / C ++编译器编译(我们需要的C和C ++)。
I want to know whether code below is safe, i.e. it will be correctly compiled by all standard-compliant C/C++ compilers (we need both C and C++).
function foo(int not_a_first_call, int *data_to_request, ...other parameters... )
{
if( not_a_first_call )
goto request_handler;
for(i=0; i<n; i++)
{
*data_to_request = i;
return;
request_handler:
...process data...
}
}
我研究的标准,但不是这样的用例的信息。我也想知道是否替换为按等价的,而将但从便携性角度是有利的。
I've studied standards, but there isn't much information about such use case. I also wonder whether replacing for by equivalent while will be beneficial from the portability point of view.
先谢谢了。
UPD :感谢所有谁曾评论
-
所有的评论者:)是的,我明白,我不能在局部变量初始化跳,我必须保存/恢复
I
每个呼叫。
有关强的原因:)这code必须实现反向通信接口。反向通信是它试图避免使用函数指针的编码模式。有时候有,因为传统code要使用哪些期望您会使用它。
about strong reasons :) This code must implement reverse communication interface. Reverse communication is a coding pattern which tries to avoid using function pointers. Sometimes it have to be used because of legacy code which expects that you will use it.
不幸的是,R-COMM接口不能在一个不错的方式实现。你不能使用函数指针,你不能轻易的工作分成几个功能。
Unfortunately, r-comm-interface can't be implemented in a nice way. You can't use function pointers and you can't easily split work into several functions.
推荐答案
似乎完全合法的。
从C99标准草案<一个href=\"http://std.dkuug.dk/JTC1/SC22/WG14/www/docs/n843.htm\">http://std.dkuug.dk/JTC1/SC22/WG14/www/docs/n843.htm在goto语句的部分:
From a draft of the C99 standard http://std.dkuug.dk/JTC1/SC22/WG14/www/docs/n843.htm in the section on the goto statement:
[#3] EXAMPLE 1 It is sometimes convenient to jump into the
middle of a complicated set of statements. The following
outline presents one possible approach to a problem based on
these three assumptions:
1. The general initialization code accesses objects only
visible to the current function.
2. The general initialization code is too large to
warrant duplication.
3. The code to determine the next operation is at the
head of the loop. (To allow it to be reached by
continue statements, for example.)
/* ... */
goto first_time;
for (;;) {
// determine next operation
/* ... */
if (need to reinitialize) {
// reinitialize-only code
/* ... */
first_time:
// general initialization code
/* ... */
continue;
}
// handle other operations
/* ... */
}
接下来,我们看一下for循环语句:
Next, we look at the for loop statement:
[#1] Except for the behavior of a continue statement in the |
loop body, the statement
for ( clause-1 ; expr-2 ; expr-3 ) statement
and the sequence of statements
{
clause-1 ;
while ( expr-2 ) {
statement
expr-3 ;
}
}
您的问题把两者结合起来告诉你,你是跳过去
Putting the two together with your problem tells you that you are jumping past
i=0;
成,而循环的中间。您将执行
into the middle of a while loop. You will execute
...process data...
然后
i++;
在控制流跳转到测试中,同时/ for循环
before flow of control jumps to the test in the while/for loop
i<n;
这篇关于C / C ++:跳转到for循环的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!