在C ++中定义静态成员 [英] Defining static members in C++
问题描述
我试图定义一个公共静态变量,如下所示:
public:
static int j = 0 ; //或任何其他值太多
我在这行上得到一个编译错误:ISO C ++ forbids
-
为什么在C ++中不允许这样做?
-
这意味着C ++中的静态变量
谢谢!
(1。)为什么不允许在C ++中?
$ b b
从 Bjarne Stroustrup的C ++风格和技巧常见问题:类通常在头文件中声明,并且头文件通常包括在许多翻译单元中。然而,为了避免复杂的链接器规则,C ++要求每个对象都有唯一的定义。如果C ++允许需要在内存中作为对象存储的实体的类定义,那么该规则将被破坏。
(2。)为什么允许const成员
初始化?
[ dirkgently更好]
(3。)在C ++中,这意味着静态变量
不会在C中初始化为0
知道,只要你在.cpp中声明了静态成员var,如果没有指定,它将被初始化为零:
// in some .cpp
int Test :: j; // j = int();
I am trying to define a public static variable like this :
public :
static int j=0; //or any other value too
I am getting a compilation error on this very line : ISO C++ forbids in-class initialization of non-const static member `j'.
Why is it not allowed in C++ ?
Why are const members allowed to be initialized ?
Does this mean static variables in C++ are not initialized with 0 as in C?
Thanks !
(1.) Why is it not allowed in C++ ?
From Bjarne Stroustrup's C++ Style and Technique FAQ: A class is typically declared in a header file and a header file is typically included into many translation units. However, to avoid complicated linker rules, C++ requires that every object has a unique definition. That rule would be broken if C++ allowed in-class definition of entities that needed to be stored in memory as objects.
(2.) Why are const members allowed to be initialized ?
(3.) Does this mean static variables in C++ are not initialized with 0 as in C?
As far as I know, as long as you declare the static member var in a .cpp it will be zero-initialized if you don't specify otherwise:
// in some .cpp
int Test::j; // j = int();
这篇关于在C ++中定义静态成员的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!