应该std :: unique_ptr< void>允许 [英] Should std::unique_ptr<void> be permitted

查看:329
本文介绍了应该std :: unique_ptr< void>允许的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

这是一个很简单的问题。考虑下面的代码:

This is a very simple question. Consider the following code:

#include <iostream>
#include <memory>

typedef std::unique_ptr<void> UniqueVoidPtr;

int main() {
    UniqueVoidPtr p(new int);
    return 0;
}

使用以下命令使用cygwin(g ++ 4.5.3)进行编译 g ++ -std = c ++ 0x -o prog file.cpp 工作正常。但是,使用微软编译器(VS 2010或2013)编译我得到这个错误:

Compiling with cygwin (g++ 4.5.3) with the following command g++ -std=c++0x -o prog file.cpp works just fine. However, compiling with the microsoft compiler (either VS 2010 or 2013) I get this error:

C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio 10.0\VC\INCLUDE\memory(2067) : error C2070: 'void': illegal sizeof operand
        C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio 10.0\VC\INCLUDE\memory(2066) : while compiling class template member function 'void std::default_delete<_Ty>::operator ()(_Ty *) const'
        with
        [
            _Ty=void
        ]
        C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio 10.0\VC\INCLUDE\type_traits(650) : see reference to class template instantiation 'std::default_delete<_Ty>' being compiled
        with
        [
            _Ty=void
        ]
        C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio 10.0\VC\INCLUDE\memory(2193) : see reference to class template instantiation 'std::tr1::is_empty<_Ty>' being compiled
        with
        [
            _Ty=std::default_delete<void>
        ]
        foo1.cpp(7) : see reference to class template instantiation 'std::unique_ptr<_Ty>' being compiled
        with
        [
            _Ty=void
        ]

这是否预期?我在写一个类,我想在类中有一个唯一的指针。当试图找出类的移动构造函数的语义时,我遇到了这个(我假设因为我最终得到我的移动构造函数正确编码:即其他错误是固定的)。

Is this expected? I'm writing a class where I wanted to have a unique pointer in the in the class. While trying to work out the semantics of a move constructor for the class, I ran into this (I assume because I finally got my move constructor coded correctly: i.e. the other errors were fixed).

推荐答案

MSVC是正确的,而GCC错误:
标准(3.9 / 5):不完全定义的对象类型和void类型不完整的
类型

标准(20.7.1.1.2 / 4):如果T是不完整的类型,程序是错误的

MSVC is right while GCC is wrong: Standard(3.9/5): Incompletely-defined object types and the void types are incomplete types Standard(20.7.1.1.2/4): If T is an incomplete type, the program is ill-formed

这篇关于应该std :: unique_ptr&lt; void&gt;允许的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
相关文章
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆