关于< chrono>头在C ++ 11 [英] Several questions about <chrono> header in C++ 11
问题描述
我对C ++ 11中的新< chrono>
标题有几个问题。使用Windows 7,Visual Studio 2012。
查看示例 http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/chrono
#include< iostream>
#include< chrono>
#include< ctime>
int fibonacci(int n)
{
if(n <3)return 1;
return fibonacci(n-1)+ fibonacci(n-2);
}
int main()
{
std :: chrono :: time_point< std :: chrono :: system_clock>开始,结束
start = std :: chrono :: system_clock :: now();
int result = fibonacci(42);
end = std :: chrono :: system_clock :: now();
int elapsed_seconds = std :: chrono :: duration_cast< std :: chrono :: seconds>
(end-start).count();
std :: time_t end_time = std :: chrono :: system_clock :: to_time_t(end);
std :: cout<< 完成计算在< std :: ctime(& end_time)
<< 经过时间:< elapsed_seconds<< s\\\
;
}
可能的输出
已于6月16日完成计算20:42:57 2012
已用时间:3s
- 我注意到该示例使用
std :: chrono :: system_clock :: now();
意味着它可以用来测量只流逝的时间,而不是CPU时间???如果我想测量CPU时间,我应该使用什么时钟? - 请注意,
已用时间:3s
的输出会舍入为整数。 -
int elapsed_seconds = std :: chrono :: duration_cast< std :: chrono :: seconds>
(end-start).count();
是时间四舍五入为整数秒。您可以选择任何期限,也可以使用浮点数表示法,以允许非整数值:
std :: int64_t elapsed_attoseconds =
std :: chrono :: duration_cast< std :: chrono :: duration< std :: int64_t,std :: atto>>
(end-start).count();
double elapsed_seconds =
std :: chrono :: duration_cast< std :: chrono :: duration< double,std :: ratio< 1>>
(end-start).count();请注意,在实际代码中,你应该避免使用.count()来逃避
chrono :: duration
提供的强类型,直到你绝对必须。auto total_duration = end - start;
auto seconds = std :: chrono :: duration_cast< std :: chrono :: seconds>(total_duration);
auto milli = std :: chrono :: duration_cast< std :: chrono :: milliseconds>(total_duration - seconds);
std :: cout<< seconds.count()< s< milli.count()<< ms\\\
;
p>正确
根据标准:
system_clock表示[s]从系统范围的实时时钟到挂钟时间。
< chrono>
library不提供测量CPU时间的机制,所以如果你想要你必须回到旧的< ctime>
库并使用 std :: clock()
。
(如果你的目标是Windows,你必须回到平台特定的API Windows提供的CPU时间,因为你指出,他们 std :: clock()
无法正常工作。
system_clock
更像是
std :: time()
的比较对象 std :: clock()
。 (例如,注意 system_clock
提供 system_clock :: time_point
s和 time_t
。)我想象在
< chrono>
中没有时钟用于测量CPU时间是由于标准委员会的时间限制,该功能比系统的挂钟和实时时钟少。
如果你想要CPU时间,但也希望< chrono>
提供,您应该实现符合标准中概述的时钟概念并提供CPU时间的时钟类型,可以使用 std :: clock() / code>。
I have several questions about new <chrono>
header in C++ 11. Using Windows 7, Visual Studio 2012.
Looking at the example http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/chrono
#include <iostream>
#include <chrono>
#include <ctime>
int fibonacci(int n)
{
if (n < 3) return 1;
return fibonacci(n-1) + fibonacci(n-2);
}
int main()
{
std::chrono::time_point<std::chrono::system_clock> start, end;
start = std::chrono::system_clock::now();
int result = fibonacci(42);
end = std::chrono::system_clock::now();
int elapsed_seconds = std::chrono::duration_cast<std::chrono::seconds>
(end-start).count();
std::time_t end_time = std::chrono::system_clock::to_time_t(end);
std::cout << "finished computation at " << std::ctime(&end_time)
<< "elapsed time: " << elapsed_seconds << "s\n";
}
Possible output
finished computation at Sat Jun 16 20:42:57 2012
elapsed time: 3s
- I have noticed that example uses
std::chrono::system_clock::now();
does it mean it can be used to measure only elapsed time and not the CPU time ??? And if I want to measure CPU time, what Clocks should I use ? - Notice that
elapsed time: 3s
is output is rounded to whole integer. Is there way to make it more granulated?
Correct
According to the standard:
system_clock represent[s] wall clock time from the system-wide realtime clock.
The
<chrono>
library does not provide a mechanism for measuring CPU time, so if you want that you'll have to fall back on the old<ctime>
library and usestd::clock()
.(And if you're targeting Windows you'll have to fall back on whatever platform-specific API Windows provides for getting CPU time since, as you point out, their
std::clock()
doesn't work correctly.)system_clock
is more like a counterpart tostd::time()
than tostd::clock()
. (E.g., note thatsystem_clock
provides conversions betweensystem_clock::time_point
s andtime_t
.) I imagine that the lack of a clock in<chrono>
for measuring CPU time is due to time constraints on the standard committee and the fact that that functionality is less used than the system's wall clock and real-time clocks.If you want CPU time but also want the benefits that
<chrono>
provides, you should implement a clock type that conforms to the Clock concept outlined in the standard and which provides CPU time, perhaps implemented internally usingstd::clock()
.The line that says
int elapsed_seconds = std::chrono::duration_cast<std::chrono::seconds> (end-start).count();
is what causes the time to be rounded to an integral number of seconds. You can choose any period you'd like, or you can use a floating point representation in order to allow non-integral values:
std::int64_t elapsed_attoseconds = std::chrono::duration_cast<std::chrono::duration<std::int64_t, std::atto>> (end-start).count(); double elapsed_seconds = std::chrono::duration_cast<std::chrono::duration<double,std::ratio<1>>> (end-start).count();
Note that in real code you should avoid using
.count()
to escape the strong typing provided bychrono::duration
until you absolutely must.auto total_duration = end - start; auto seconds = std::chrono::duration_cast<std::chrono::seconds>(total_duration); auto milli = std::chrono::duration_cast<std::chrono::milliseconds>(total_duration - seconds); std::cout << seconds.count() << "s " << milli.count() << "ms\n";
这篇关于关于< chrono>头在C ++ 11的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!