是< random>库在c ++ 11可移植? [英] Is the <random> library in c++11 portable?

查看:136
本文介绍了是< random>库在c ++ 11可移植?的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

库是否在c ++ 11可移植?

Is the library in c++11 portable? I have avoided rand() because I heard it wasn't portable.

推荐答案

如何定义可移植?

如果通过portable,你的意思是将产生相同输入的随机数的二进制相同序列,则是, rand 不可移植。是的, C ++随机数生成器是可移植的(大多数不是 std :: default_random_engine std :: random_device ),因为它们实现了特定算法。 rand 可以是任何东西,只要它不完全不同于随机数字生成器。

If by "portable", you mean "will produce binary identical sequences of random numbers given the same input", then yes, rand isn't portable. And yes, the C++ random generators are portable (most of them. Not std::default_random_engine or std::random_device), because they implement specific algorithms. rand is allowed to be anything, as long as it's not entirely unlike a random number generator.

,正如@PeteBecker指出的,分布本身没有这么好定义。因此, std :: mt19937 会为给定的种子产生相同的值序列,不同 std :: uniform_int_distribution 可以为同一输入序列和范围提供不同的值。

That being said, as @PeteBecker pointed out, the distributions themselves are not so well-defined. So while std::mt19937 will produce the same sequence of values for a given seed, different std::uniform_int_distributions can give different values for the same input sequence and range.

当然,如果你需要一致性,你总是可以定义自己的分布。

Of course, if you need consistency, you can always define your own distribution.

这篇关于是< random>库在c ++ 11可移植?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆