选择/分配给data.table变量,其名称存储在字符向量中 [英] Select / assign to data.table variables which names are stored in a character vector
问题描述
如果变量名存储在字符向量中,那么如何引用 data.table
中的变量?例如,这适用于 data.frame
:
How do you refer to variables in a data.table
if the variable names are stored in a character vector? For instance, this works for a data.frame
:
df <- data.frame(col1 = 1:3)
colname <- "col1"
df[colname] <- 4:6
df
# col1
# 1 4
# 2 5
# 3 6
如何使用:=
符号对data.table执行相同的操作?显而易见的事情 dt [,list(colname)]
不工作(也不期望它)。
How can I perform this same operation for a data.table, either with or without :=
notation? The obvious thing of dt[ , list(colname)]
doesn't work (nor did I expect it to).
推荐答案
尝试:
DT = data.table(col1 = 1:3)
colname = "col1"
DT[, colname, with=FALSE] # select
# col1
# 1: 1
# 2: 2
# 3: 3
DT[, (colname) := 4:6] # assign
# col1
# 1: 4
# 2: 5
# 3: 6
后者称为列 plonk ,因为您通过引用替换整个列向量。如果存在 i
的子集,它将通过引用进行子分配。 (colname)
上的括号是在CRAN 2014年10月版本v1.9.4中引入的缩写。以下是新闻项:
The latter is known as a column plonk, because you replace the whole column vector by reference. If a subset i
was present, it would subassign by reference. The parens around (colname)
is a shorthand introduced in version v1.9.4 on CRAN Oct 2014. Here is the news item :
Using with=FALSE with := is now deprecated in all cases, given that wrapping
the LHS of := with parentheses has been preferred for some time.
colVar = "col1"
DT[, colVar:=1, with=FALSE] # deprecated, still works silently
DT[, (colVar):=1] # please change to this
DT[, c("col1","col2"):=1] # no change
DT[, 2:4 := 1] # no change
DT[, c("col1","col2"):=list(sum(a),mean(b)] # no change
DT[, `:=`(...), by=...] # no change
另请参见<$ c $中的详细 c>?:=`:
See also Details section in ?`:=`
:
DT[i,(colnamevector):=value]
# [...] The parens are enough to stop the LHS being a symbol
为了在评论中回答更多的问题,这里有一种方法(通常有很多方法):
And to answer further question in comment, here's one way (as usual there are many ways) :
DT[, colname:=cumsum(get(colname)), with=FALSE]
# col1
# 1: 4
# 2: 9
# 3: 15
或者,您可能会发现只需更改 eval
a 粘贴
,类似于构造动态SQL语句以发送到服务器:
or, you might find it easier to read, write and debug just to eval
a paste
, similar to constructing a dynamic SQL statement to send to a server :
expr = paste0("DT[,",colname,":=cumsum(",colname,")]")
expr
# [1] "DT[,col1:=cumsum(col1)]"
> eval(parse(text=expr))
# col1
# 1: 4
# 2: 13
# 3: 28
如果你这么做,你可以定义一个辅助函数 EVAL
:
If you do that a lot, you can define a helper function EVAL
:
EVAL = function(...)eval(parse(text=paste0(...)),envir=parent.frame(2))
EVAL("DT[,",colname,":=cumsum(",colname,")]")
# col1
# 1: 4
# 2: 17
# 3: 45
现在 data.table
1.8.2为了效率自动优化 j
,最好使用 eval
方法。 在
j
中会阻止某些优化。
Now that data.table
1.8.2 automatically optimizes j
for efficiency, it may be preferable to use the eval
method. The get()
in j
prevents some optimizations, for example.
或者,有 set()
。 :=
的低开销,功能形式,这里很好。请参阅?set
。
Or, there is set()
. A low overhead, functional form of :=
, which would be fine here. See ?set
.
set(DT,j=colname,value=cumsum(DT[[colname]]))
DT
# col1
# 1: 4
# 2: 21
# 3: 66
这篇关于选择/分配给data.table变量,其名称存储在字符向量中的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!