您使用哪种JMS实现？ [英] Which JMS implementation do you use?

问题描述

我们正在使用 ActiveMQ 5.2 作为我们的首选实施方案，我们刚才选择了它。它现在可以很好地用于我们的使用。从一段时间以来，我想知道其他Java Message Service实现正在使用中，为什么？肯定有不止一些。

We are using ActiveMQ 5.2 as our implementation of choice and we picked it a while ago. It performs well enough for our use right now. Since its been a while, I was wondering what other Java Message Service implementations are in use and why? Surely there are more than a few.

推荐答案

在深入研究JMS之前，考虑一下AMQP - 可能是一个新标准。
与我合作的JMS提供商（在不同程度上）：

Before delving into JMS, consider AMQP as well - might be a new standard. JMS providers I worked with (in varying degrees):

TIBCO EMS - 非常快速，强大，良好的API支持，Java友好，本机C API存在。我用过的最佳商业选择。

TIBCO EMS - very quick and robust, good API support, Java friendly, native C API exists. Best commercial choice I've used.

Websphere MQ（及其JMS实现） - 所以，所以。发布/订阅不是很快，许多配置选项和选择都是奇怪的，并且从该产品的悠久历史中过于复杂。只需查看文档数量......

Websphere MQ (and its JMS implementation) - so, so. Pub/sub not exactly quick, many configurations options and choices are 'strange' and overly complex from the long history of that product. Just look at the amount of documentation...

Solace JMS - 非常高的吞吐量（JMS代理内置硬件！），连接协议的良好选择（MQTT， AMQP，XML over http作为管理员协议）

Solace JMS - very high throughput (the JMS broker is built in hardware !), good choices of connecting protocols (MQTT, AMQP, XML over http as admin protocols)

Fiorano MQ - 曾经在市场营销方面具有攻击性但却失去了很多市场份额，成熟度问题

Fiorano MQ - used to be agressive in marketing but lost a lot of market share, maturity concerns

Sonic MQ - 可靠的产品，也支持C API

Sonic MQ - solid product, also supports a C API

Active MQ - 如果你想使用开源产品（不值钱）支持，优秀的社区，有限的附加产品，有限的企业功能）这可能是您的最佳选择。开箱即用，是Apache Camel等几种工具的支柱。

Active MQ - if you want to go with an open-source product (unexpensive support, great community, limited add-on products, limited enterprise features) this is probably your best choice. Works out of the box and is the backbone of several tools like Apache Camel, for example.

这篇关于您使用哪种JMS实现？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！