转移到usenet？ [英] move to usenet?
问题描述
大家好，
这不是巨魔，我当然不想开始圣战但是
不是吗将postgresql列表从
邮件列表方法移到usenet是个好主意？恕我直言，它更开放，更容易工作
with。就像现在一样，有一些postgreql usenet组但很难
那里发生任何事情。
只是一个想法...
---------------------------（广播结束）------------- --------------
提示3：如果通过Usenet发布/阅读，请发送适当的
subscribe-nomail命令给< a href =mailto：ma ******* @ postgresql.org> ma ******* @ postgresql.org 以便您的
消息可以获得干净地通过邮件清单
Hello everyone,
This is not a troll and I certainly don''t want to start a holy war but
wouldn''t it be a good idea to move the postgresql lists from the
mailing list approach to usenet? IMHO it''s more open and easier to work
with. As it is now, there are some postgreql usenet groups but hardly
anything happens there.
Just an idea...
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to ma*******@postgresql.org so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
推荐答案
2003年8月19日星期二09:06在
< 20****************************@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ *********@arbodienst-limburg.nl）写道：
On Tuesday 19 Aug 2003 09:06 in
<20************************@koshin.dsl.systemec.nl >, Jules Alberts
(ju***********@arbodienst-limburg.nl) wrote:
这不是巨魔，我当然不想开始圣战但是<将postgresql列表从
邮件列表方法移到usenet上不是一个好主意吗？
This is not a troll and I certainly don''t want to start a holy war but
wouldn''t it be a good idea to move the postgresql lists from the
mailing list approach to usenet?
我不喜欢知道其他任何人，但我已经从Usenet新闻服务器上阅读这些消息
。我没有收到它们作为电子邮件。
我同意许多邮件没有根据Usenet
约定进行格式化，但我通常将其归因于Windows知道
的用户对互联网一无所知。因此，顶级发布和完整报价在Usenet上充满了所有
。
-
问候，
戴夫[RLU＃314465]
=========================== ======================= ====
dw **** @ spamtrap.ntlworld.com （David W Noon）
删除垃圾邮件陷阱以通过电子邮件回复。
=== =============================================== === =
I don''t know about anybody else, but I am already reading these messages
from a Usenet newsserver. I do not receive them as e-mail.
I agree that many messages are not formatted according to Usenet
conventions, but I normally attribute that to Windows users who know
nothing about the Internet. Thus, top-posting and full-quoting are rife all
across Usenet.
--
Regards,
Dave [RLU#314465]
================================================== ====
dw****@spamtrap.ntlworld.com (David W Noon)
Remove spam trap to reply via e-mail.
================================================== ====
我现在使用outlook express访问news.postgresql.org。
效果很好。
David W Noon < dw **** @ spamtrap.ntlworld.com>
新闻：1o ************ @ my-pc.ntlworld.com ...
I use outlook express to visit news.postgresql.org now.
It works well.
"David W Noon" <dw****@spamtrap.ntlworld.com>
news:1o************@my-pc.ntlworld.com...
2003年8月19日星期二09:06在
< 20 ************************ @ koshin.dsl .systemec.nl>，Jules Alberts
（ju***********@arbodienst-limburg.nl）写道：
On Tuesday 19 Aug 2003 09:06 in
<20************************@koshin.dsl.systemec.nl >, Jules Alberts
(ju***********@arbodienst-limburg.nl) wrote:
这不是一个巨魔，我当然不想开始一场神圣的战争，但是将postgresql列表从
邮件列表方法转移到usenet上不是一个好主意吗？
我不知道其他人，但我已经从Usenet新闻服务器上阅读这些消息了。我不接收它们作为电子邮件。
我同意许多邮件没有根据Usenet
约定格式化，但我通常将其归因于知道
的Windows用户关于互联网。因此，顶级发布和完整引用在整个Usenet上充斥着
This is not a troll and I certainly don''t want to start a holy war but
wouldn''t it be a good idea to move the postgresql lists from the
mailing list approach to usenet?
I don''t know about anybody else, but I am already reading these messages
from a Usenet newsserver. I do not receive them as e-mail.
I agree that many messages are not formatted according to Usenet
conventions, but I normally attribute that to Windows users who know
nothing about the Internet. Thus, top-posting and full-quoting are rife
。
-
问候，
戴夫[RLU＃314465]
======================================= =========== ====
dw****@spamtrap.ntlworld.com （David W Noon）
删除垃圾邮件陷阱以通过电子邮件回复。
======================= =========================== ====
all across Usenet.
--
Regards,
Dave [RLU#314465]
================================================== ====
dw****@spamtrap.ntlworld.com (David W Noon)
Remove spam trap to reply via e-mail.
================================================== ====
在2003年8月19日星期二，Jules Alberts写道：
On Tue, 19 Aug 2003, Jules Alberts wrote:
大家好，
这不是巨魔，我当然不想开始神圣的战争，但将postgresql列表从
邮件列表方法转移到usenet不是一个好主意吗？恕我直言，它更开放，更容易上班。就像现在一样，有一些postgreql usenet组，但几乎没有发生任何事情。
Hello everyone,
This is not a troll and I certainly don''t want to start a holy war but
wouldn''t it be a good idea to move the postgresql lists from the
mailing list approach to usenet? IMHO it''s more open and easier to work
with. As it is now, there are some postgreql usenet groups but hardly
anything happens there.
实际上，新闻源应该被镜像到个人
新闻组，即我们将邮件列表连接到usenet。
我认为垃圾邮件可能是我们坚持使用邮件列表的主要原因。由于电子邮件垃圾邮件不好，因此使用垃圾邮件的情况要糟糕得多，而且更难过滤。
---------------- -----------（播出结束）---------------------------
提示5：您是否检查了我们广泛的常见问题解答？
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html
Actually, the news feeds are supposed to be mirrored out to the individual
news groups, i.e. we gateway the mailing lists to usenet.
I think Spam is probably the main reason we stick with mailing lists. As
bad as email spam is, usenet spam is far worse, and harder to filter.
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html
这篇关于转移到usenet？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
